To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8531
8530  |  8532
Subject: 
Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:26:39 GMT
Viewed: 
2408 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger wrote:

On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 04:08:51PM +0000, Tim Courtney wrote:
Advance users that edit the files manually already have
to understand the file format, with everything that goes with it.

Sure, understood. I still like the idea of a more common character; even
encapsulating (META) in parenthasees is more common.

sure, that works almost as well as {}.  It's the _lack_ of any
punctuation that bothered me there.

Dan,

You program in *Perl*.  Of course you think it's good to always have
punctuation.  You probably think more punctuation == better. ;)

Steve



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
(...) you mean $puctuation++ > ! $puctuation ? $goodness++ : $goodness-- ; ? (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.off-topic.geek)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Backwards Compatibility (Was Calling all Meta-commands)
 
(...) sure, that works almost as well as {}. It's the _lack_ of any punctuation that bothered me there. :) (22 years ago, 16-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR