Subject:
|
Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 00:26:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3840 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney wrote:
> Why not keep previous meta-commands where they're at, but also introduce a
> new line-type exclusively for meta-commands?
Because it wouldn't be supported by LDraw and LEdit. Part files frequently
include comments, so any standard option for commenting should be allowable
in the parts library.
> I'm not too keen on MLCad's
> WRITE, to me it makes little to no sense. Maybe if it was COMMENT or even !
> (like an HTML comment) instead I'd buy it.
Some people already use COMMENT.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
| (...) Right. Elsewhere in the thread you'll see I tested it in LEdit and it crashed -- that was soon ruled out of the discussion, at least for now :-) (...) Nit: That's a bit too much for my tastes. What's wrong with //? -Tim (24 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
| (...) Why not keep previous meta-commands where they're at, but also introduce a new line-type exclusively for meta-commands? I'm not too keen on MLCad's WRITE, to me it makes little to no sense. Maybe if it was COMMENT or even ! (like an HTML (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
