To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8423
8422  |  8424
Subject: 
Re: Calling all Meta-commands
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 03:12:55 GMT
Viewed: 
1557 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Ross Crawford writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin Clague writes:
I could not agree more.  I've been tossing around the concepts of an LDraw
file format standards body with Tim and others, and IMHO the weakest link in
the LDraw file format is that comments and meta-commands use the same record
type.  It is a bummer.

Kevin & Travis -
These are very good points. As a non-programmer, but someone who has a
general knowledge of the LDraw file format, I think it is a good idea to
separate comments from meta-commands.

Why not force comments to be a meta-command like MLcad does with WRITE? Then
the only problem you have is new files created with Ledit, and old files
which will need to be converted. And Ldraw would still handle them OK.

Why not keep previous meta-commands where they're at, but also introduce a
new line-type exclusively for meta-commands? I'm not too keen on MLCad's
WRITE, to me it makes little to no sense. Maybe if it was COMMENT or even !
(like an HTML comment) instead I'd buy it. I guess that's just quirky 'ol
(or young) me, though ;-)

-Tim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) Because it wouldn't be supported by LDraw and LEdit. Part files frequently include comments, so any standard option for commenting should be allowable in the parts library. (...) Some people already use COMMENT. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) Why not force comments to be a meta-command like MLcad does with WRITE? Then the only problem you have is new files created with Ledit, and old files which will need to be converted. And Ldraw would still handle them OK. ROSCO (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR