|
 | | Re: Any way to scale models/parts in ldraw? [DAT]
|
| (...) I don't know of an editor that will doing scaling operations (although LDAO's Editor *should*). I can think of two solutions: 1. Keep your image.dat as a separate file. Whenever you need to use it, reference it like a part-file. To scale, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.942)
|
|
| | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license)
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G1Awuz.JpB@lugnet.com... (...) instructive. (...) contribution) (...) are (...) form. (...) just (...) granting (...) ought to (...) bother. Yup. (...) borrow (...) I did a search for (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.942)
|
|
| | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license)
|
| Bog. This particular question is very thorny and very important to get right. NELUG stumbled over "who is in NELUG" a while back. And they're not trying to grant rights to anyone that need to survive their discorporation! US copyright and IP law in (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.942)
|
|
| | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license)
|
| (...) Right. But we'd be building cloud castles without it. (...) What if someone declines to accept? What if someone modifies that license slightly? With a structure and an org you have the power to reject. I think this sort of license (IANAL!!!!!) (...) (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license)
|
| (...) I don't think it's a matter of correct/incorrect/right/wrong. It's a matter of agreeing on the definition for 'ldraw.org'. Or, it's a matter of deciding the parameters for the perimeter of our group, and then deciding on a name for that group. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license)
|
| (...) *Sigh*. That's the answer to the question I didn't want to ask. Before going on with replying to the rest of your post, I want to throw out something for consideration: Would it be possible to write the 'license' so that there's a direct (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: "Needs Work"- Needs Work
|
| (...) I get the same _Couldn't find the resource_ error with this URL as I do with (URL) Are you sure there is public access below www.ldraw.org/dev ? Chris (24 years ago, 8-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: Parts license
|
| (...) I think 2 means Ldraw.org has the right to chose what to keep and 7 means that the work will become part of the Ldraw.org library (and probably "protected" by the license). Although they are related for sure. Jude (24 years ago, 20-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: Parts license
|
| (...) I'd definitely be somewhat concerned about a license which restricted the parts from being used with non-free programs. I'd hate to preclude the possibility of a really awesome commercial program being forced to re-invent the wheel, and (...) (24 years ago, 18-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: Parts license
|
| Bram Lambrecht skrev i meddelandet ... (...) Is this always possible/wanted? I have made a program (experimental as yet) that converts LDRAW parts to BlockCAD format, but as BC can't use the level of detail that LDRAW gives, I need to go through the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license)
|
| "Leonardo Zide" <leonardo@centroin.com.br> wrote in message news:39CFBA54.A0214F....com.br... (...) Yup. (...) I still say that we need a dedicated subgroup of Lugnuts to take care of LCAD - whether it pertains to all of LCAD or to just the people (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw CD-ROM Issues
|
| (...) I guess I'd kinda figure that the people who'd care the most are the ones who aren't online enough to know about it and speak up. I'd love an LDraw CD-ROM, for example, if I didn't have net access...but since I do, there's on value in it to (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: Who are 'ldraw.org'? (was: Parts license)
|
| (...) I think that would be the best solution. IIRC, GPL doesn't have any organizations mentioned (maybe they say something about the FSF), it's a direct agreement between users and authors. Why don't we simply use GPL or LGPL ? Leonardo (24 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: More tips for L3P
|
| Manfred, Well, I'm sorry, but though I did follow all your instructions completely (I think) none of them really fixed my problem, but they did give me insight into how to write a Batch file. Here's what I did to get L3P to run correctly: I put (...) (24 years ago, 5-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
|
| | Re: More tips for L3P
|
| (...) The problem is the first one you listed: L3P.bat and L3P.exe are in the same directory. C:\Ldraw\L3P.bat C:\Ldraw\L3P.exe How should I separate them so L3P.bat will be found first? --Ryan Lugnet member #517 E-mail: Ryanjf2@juno.com Amateur (...) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.941)
|
