CAD Development : Search Results: Stickers in LDraw


CAD / Development / Search Results: Stickers in LDraw

Results 1941 – 1960 of about 7000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: LDraw.org Config File (was: Edge line colors on img.lugnet.com)
(...) Right off the bat, I'd like to say that I think using a different notation for (A)RGB would be a good thing. Whether it's #RRGGBB or something else, I don't care. Also, should we go to a tagged format? Tags could make it easier to support (...) (21 years ago, 16-Aug-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: Announcing LDraw.org Relaunch
(...) I believe (and don't quote me on this) ;-) ... that what we did was move over usernames, but will require you to reset your password. This was a technical/security issue. Try to reset your password through the system, if that doesn't work, (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw Design Pad Version 1.5 Released
(...) I get an error saying "The setup files are corrupted. Please obtain a new copy of the program." when I try to install the downloaded LDDesignPad150.exe Niels (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw Design Pad Version 1.5 Released
(...) get the same error. w. (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw Design Pad Version 1.5 Released
(...) That's strange, I just downloaded the file and it installed fine. I've uploaded a new copy to the server, please give it another try: (URL) (21 years ago, 9-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw Design Pad Version 1.5 Released
(...) (the broken file had a size of 1134 KB the working one 2793 KB). w. (21 years ago, 10-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Updates page still WAY out of date
(...) I wouldn't say "way out of date" is a appropriate label, it's more like "some things have fallen through the cracks". As far as the missing items you have brought up, the issue is known and someone is assigned to fix it. Addionally, the (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Updates page still WAY out of date
(...) I don't know that my post had anything to do with it, but in any event thanks to whoever updated the page for updating it. And my "way out of date" title was badly chosen, but I do think 7 months is a long time on the web. --Travis (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: * LDraw Design Pad LDDP 1.52 released *
(...) Well I finally got around to trying this out! And I like it! Have a couple of suggestions though (only little ones!): The readme.txt file still has info on installation, that still talks about un-zipping a ZIP file - I think this section (...) (21 years ago, 6-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: * LDraw Design Pad (LDDP) 1.53 released *
(...) Most of us know where to get it by now, but for the noobs: (URL) (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: * LDraw Design Pad (LDDP) 1.53 released *
(...) Thanks Ross. I can't believe I forgot to post a URL. -Orion (21 years ago, 26-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I can't find anything I don't like about the Bylaws. I support ratification. -Orion (21 years ago, 27-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: * LDraw Design Pad (LDDP) 1.53 released *
(...) F12, F12, F12, F12, .... ;-)))...))), w. (21 years ago, 27-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) That reads better to me. (...) Well maybe we need such a mechanism anyway, in case other unknown conflicts or questions arise in future? ROSCO (21 years ago, 29-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) part-time, student, non-career, professional, careerist ,steering committee, fellow member, active member ... there is a german saying: den wald vor lauter bäumen nicht sehen (not spotting the forest because of too many trees ;-) I remember (...) (21 years ago, 31-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) Ok, but at what point does a conflict of interect exist? Do we really need to exclude every worker simply because membership from a small subset poses a conflict of interest? -Orion (21 years ago, 2-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) This is the best I can come up with: Any person who works in a retail outlet (including kiosks, mall stores, and theme park centers) from the store manager position down or any worker in manufacturing, shipping, or goundskeeping/housekeeping (...) (21 years ago, 3-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I agree. (...) I suggested nothing. I was merely asking a question. Can you just answer it without reading motives into it that don't exist? Is it really necessary to be a member of the steering committee in order for suggestions on the (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws Drafts: Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
(...) I see. I wasn't clear on what role the LSC has. I've gone back over the posts dealing with that subject and understand it better now. Nevertheless, I still think it was a valid question. (...) Not really. It's less to do with the way I worded (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

		Re: LDraw.org Bylaws - new proposed clauses
(...) What about MegaBloks, or any other company that may have an interest? Why pointing the finger on TLC only? Why not have a more general clause about conflict of interest? -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

ldraw
(score: 1.153)

More: Next Page >>