 | | Re: LDraw/CAD links
|
|
(...) Use a single link for both tools. I would suggest that you identify the it as "MPD Tools". Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (26 years ago, 31-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | problem with parts
|
|
i have discovered a problem with some of the parts e.g. the 10 x 10 octogonal plate and the blue squares pattern bricks. these parts have the reference to the stud files in caps. this causes problems with ledit which fails to draw the line instead (...) (26 years ago, 31-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New version of LDLIST (3.5)
|
|
Steve Bliss skrev i meddelandet <3701300a.26468070@l...et.com>... (...) You did a re-scan of course? How does your .dat-file with the CATEGORY or KEYWORDS lines look (can you mail me one?). It worked for me (naturally), but of course I must have (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New version of LDLIST (3.5)
|
|
(...) That works. :) (...) This doesn't seem to work. :( (...) You didn't have to tell me twice. Steve (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part: octogonal offset brick
|
|
(...) Nice job, clean. Not highly accurate, but it works in models just fine. Steve (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | New version of LDLIST (3.5)
|
|
Steve Bliss skrev i meddelandet <3700dea1.5624485@lu...et.com>... (...) chicken-and-egg (...) entries, (...) software (...) information (...) OK folks! Version 3.5 of LDLIST is available for download at (URL) Summary: Ldlist is a little Windows (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw/CAD links
|
|
(...) Oh yes, definitely. Is this (below) the best URL then, since the distributions are given as .ZIP files linked to from that page--? (URL) listed as "MPD Builder" in the links list but lemme know if it should be listed with a different name, or (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Colour for conducting parts (Was: Studs)
|
|
-----Original message----- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: dinsdag 30 maart 1999 18:19 Subject: Colour for conducting parts (Was: Studs) Jacob, thank you for the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
(...) [...] (...) :-( What about L2P and LDLite? (Haven't got them running here) Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Colour for conducting parts (Was: Studs)
|
|
Manfred: (...) I may have worded it too strongly when I wrote "decided", but I have appended the relevant messages from L-CAD, so you can decide for yourself. Play well, Jacob PS: Could everybody please check the colour section in the FAQ and tell (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
(...) Guess what, L3P does not render them chrome, but yellow (not even gold!). Laurentino Martins [mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt] [(URL) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
-----Original mesage----- From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: dinsdag 30 maart 1999 15:01 Subject: Re: Studs (...) I have failed to notice this decision. I was not the (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Studs
|
|
(...) It's not an issue for the primitives committee, because there are electric contacts in parts as well as in primitives. I'm not against changing the color to a grey-shade, but I'm not unhappy with the current standard. Steve (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw/CAD links
|
|
Todd: (...) [...] (...) in "amter" (counties?) and then in major cities. That's fine, but you might want to fix the names. - Nordjylland (Fredrikshavn, Ålborg?) - Vestjylland (Ribe) - Østjylland (Århus, Billund?) - Sønderjylland (Sønderborg, (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
|
(...) Until now, no one has paid much attention to the idea of having these keywords around. I agree with you completely, but it's a chicken-and-egg problem. Until we've got software to support using the CATEGORY entries, we can't depend on them. (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Inv DB (was: Star Wars Elements)
|
|
(...) Hmm. Let me add just a couple of bells and whistles, to make it more usable (and to document-by-example). The db is actually my tool[1] for writing LEGO set inventories. Part-lookup is just one important aspect of this activity. Steve -- 1-For (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: parts DESPERATLY wanted (steve: please read)
|
|
Ahh. Everyone, assume I canceled my reply to jonathan just before this. Well, it will probably show up below this posting in the threaded-view. Hmmm. I don't have the new green roadplates, so I don't know if they are the same as the previous 7-stud (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) :) (...) I have MS-Access if you ever feel like throwing what you have out for general consumption. (...) Yup. (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars Elements
|
|
(...) This part is probably the one new element in the SW sets that I am most excited about. Well, I think having a bunch of light sabre hilts could be really cool, too. For decorative detail work on large spaceships/SF settings. Thinking about it, (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
