Subject:
|
Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 Mar 1999 14:27:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
860 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:51:07 GMT, "Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn"
<nzlijn@euronet.nl> wrote:
> Steve, Is it not a good idea to confine the category specification a little
> bit more, After all, some parts have a first word in their name that are not
> good examples for a category name. If we want to use these meta statements
> in the future, now is the appropriate time to enforce some regulation on it.
> I think it will get out of hands and result in a unusable mess if you don't.
Until now, no one has paid much attention to the idea of having these
keywords around. I agree with you completely, but it's a chicken-and-egg
problem. Until we've got software to support using the CATEGORY entries,
we can't depend on them. And there's no impetus to creating the software
to support the CATEGORY entries, unless we're depending on the information
they contain.
:-/
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | New version of LDLIST (3.5)
|
| Steve Bliss skrev i meddelandet <3700dea1.5624485@lu...et.com>... (...) chicken-and-egg (...) entries, (...) software (...) information (...) OK folks! Version 3.5 of LDLIST is available for download at (URL) Summary: Ldlist is a little Windows (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Complete list of metacommands?
|
| -----Original message----- From: Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> To: lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Date: maandag 29 maart 1999 22:00 Subject: Re: Complete list of metacommands? (...) Steve answered, (...) Steve, Is it (...) (26 years ago, 30-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
