 | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Kevin Clague
|
| | | (...) Travis, I could not agree more. I've been tossing around the concepts of an LDraw file format standards body with Tim and others, and IMHO the weakest link in the LDraw file format is that comments and meta-commands use the same record type. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Kevin & Travis - These are very good points. As a non-programmer, but someone who has a general knowledge of the LDraw file format, I think it is a good idea to separate comments from meta-commands. Also, talk of a standards body is a good (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Why not force comments to be a meta-command like MLcad does with WRITE? Then the only problem you have is new files created with Ledit, and old files which will need to be converted. And Ldraw would still handle them OK. ROSCO (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | (...) Why not keep previous meta-commands where they're at, but also introduce a new line-type exclusively for meta-commands? I'm not too keen on MLCad's WRITE, to me it makes little to no sense. Maybe if it was COMMENT or even ! (like an HTML (...) (22 years ago, 15-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Because it wouldn't be supported by LDraw and LEdit. Part files frequently include comments, so any standard option for commenting should be allowable in the parts library. (...) Some people already use COMMENT. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Right. Elsewhere in the thread you'll see I tested it in LEdit and it crashed -- that was soon ruled out of the discussion, at least for now :-) (...) Nit: That's a bit too much for my tastes. What's wrong with //? -Tim (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I agree. (...) What's wrong with -? Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Orion Pobursky
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I've been avoiding weighing in on this issue but.. How about a double hyphen, '--' -Orion (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Hmm, the sequel to a hyphen... I like hyphen or double hyphen because they contrast more with the surrounding text. I agree with Kevin, anything's better than nothing. Steve (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Kevin Clague
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Steve, *anything* is better than nothing. Trying to read a DAT/LDR program that has *lots* of comments with interspersed meta-commands is really hard. I've programmed for 30 years, and I've never seen hyphen used as a start of comment. I guess (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | | | (...) not that anyone ever heard of it, but ESQL (IBM language for MQSI) uses double hyphen for comments. That said, if I had to choose between '--' and '//', I'd go with the slashes. oooh - here's an idea. We could change the Ldraw.org poll (which (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Ok... I'll throw it on the to-do list to dig up the poll documentation and change it. Lazy me! -Tim (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I searched through all my LDraw email archives, with key messages going back to 1999(!), and couldn't find it. So, I emailed Jacob for instructions and will get this done in the next day or so, when he gets that to me. -Tim (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Rosco, Unfortunately, MLCAD's use of WRITE is a really bad example, because MLCAD is mis-using an already standard meta-command. Plus, 0 WRITE statements are not allowed in official parts, so any part authors who create their files in MLCAD (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | (...) Has a hyphen been used anywhere for a similar purpose? I'm not aware of it. I'm one of the least-techy of the bunch, though I can hack some code, and I think it's better to stick to what most know, as long as it's not cumbersome like {}. I (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Travis Cobbs
|
| | | | | | (...) They might be comfortable with any number of conventions, but I guarantee they will forget sometimes if you try to require them to change the way they enter comments. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | (...) So we (well, the SB eventually) decide on one way, stick to it, and implement it in programs. We can put a request in to Michael Lachmann to change the insertion of "WRITE" (which is an improper use of a meta-command) with "//" so future (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Kevin Clague
|
| | | | | | (...) Travis, By definition, all the programs have to be able to handle the original unadorned comments of type 0 records. This is a requirement for all 0.27 compliant programs. This means that anything we don't recognize as a meta-command is a (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I agree. (...) Nit: we've already *got* an LDraw file format spec. Next item! (...) 'Control' is heavy-handed for my tastes. 'Support', 'endorse', 'coordinate' are all better. All a standards body could do is manage the documentation, and (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) Good point. Thanks for nit-correcting, I think the intent is there on my part but semantics can play a role in whether or not people like/dislike an idea. (...) You're right on that part. That's why it would be a good thing to encourage (not (...) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| | | | |
