Subject:
|
Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Mar 2003 12:50:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1603 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Travis Cobbs writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
> > I don't think the average, non-programmer users will 1) hand edit files too
> > often or 2) have a hard time learning //.
>
> They might be comfortable with any number of conventions, but I guarantee
> they will forget sometimes if you try to require them to change the way they
> enter comments.
Travis,
By definition, all the programs have to be able to handle the original
unadorned comments of type 0 records. This is a requirement for all 0.27
compliant programs. This means that anything we don't recognize as a
meta-command is a comment. I get the impression that you think this is
going to change.
For 0.27 compliant DAT/LDR files, adding a meta-command that means comment
will only be of aid to the human reading the file. This could be a huge
help reading someone elses files where you don't know all the meta-commands
used.
With file versioning, we can require a comment prefix, and the user will get
a warning about un-recognized meta-command when the forget to start their
comment with the comment meta-command.
Kevin
>
> --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
| (...) They might be comfortable with any number of conventions, but I guarantee they will forget sometimes if you try to require them to change the way they enter comments. --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (22 years ago, 22-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
154 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
