Subject:
|
Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 22:29:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
465 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello Steve,
Looks very good...
The easiest solution would be to add an 'Date of first submission' field in
the part table.
Because this field didn't exists so far the start value should be the date
of the last action on a part.
Then a parts thats been worked on won't fall back to the end of the line
until it has 2 certified votes.
Parts which have 2 certified normal votes shouldn't show up then anymore....
If you need any help (I'm a database expert in almost all know databases)
let me know...
Play well
Carsteb
"Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:GxnwJx.Lyz@lugnet.com...
> Here's a first attempt: <http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptqueue.cgi>.
>
> This page excludes Certified! and Held files, and sorts by
> most-recent-action-date, oldest to newest. It does not take
> superfile-subfile relations into account.
>
> Take a look, and let me know what you think.
>
> One down side of this view: as each file is reviewed, it moves to the end • of
> the queue. So the net effect of having people work off the file queue • page
> is that files will tend to stay on the parts tracker, and many files will
> become certified at once.
>
> Steve
>
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Jacob Sparre Andersen writes:
> > Steve Bliss wrote:
> > > In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee wrote:
> > > > I'd like to see an easier way to target parts that have been in the
> > > > queue for
> > > > the longest,
> > >
> > > Good idea. I don't think this would work as 'just another sort' of the
> > > parts list page <http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptlist.cgi>. I'd rather
> > > have a "most in need of attention" page, with the following parameters:
> > >
> > > 1. Exclude all certified files.
> > > 2. Sort the files by date of last action, with the oldest listed first.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > Things I'm not sure about:
> > >
> > > Should Held files be included or not?
> >
> > I don't think they should be included (as a reviewer).
> >
> > > Should file dependencies be accounted for in the sort? That is, should
> > > a subfile appear higher in the list than its parent part?
> >
> > I think so.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker
|
| Here's a first attempt: (URL). This page excludes Certified! and Held files, and sorts by most-recent-action-date, oldest to newest. It does not take superfile-subfile relations into account. Take a look, and let me know what you think. One down (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
