To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7234
7233  |  7235
Subject: 
Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Fri, 17 May 2002 01:00:46 GMT
Viewed: 
737 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dev, Martijn Zwaal writes:
You were right about the strange reflections. By accident I had put my light
source behind the scene and had the facing flipped. Now I have put a
directional light straight at the scene with 'non viewer dependant' specular
highlighting. This looks much better.
I also fixed the mouse control and added the 'a' and 'z' buttons to move up
and down.
Now you can see that the normals are calculated correctly. You can also see
that the 1-8sphe.dat primitive needs to be fixed at the edges because the
seams don't match.It is e.g.. visible at the top of the trees. This should
be smooth like with the cylinders.

OK, the lighting is definitely much less confusing now, and it's much easier
to do the rotations.

About the spheres not joining properly: are you applying the surface normal
averaging at the dat file level, or at the part level?  If you're doing it
at the part level, then the spheres should look smooth, since the points
should be the same on type 5 lines along the edge as the quads that adjoin
those lines.  If you're doing it at the DAT file level, it would explain the
behavior, though.

--Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
 
(...) normal (...) the (...) I somewhat disagree with that. I do averaging at Dat file level and you can see that it works for cylinders. There should be no difference between connections of cylinder segments and sphere segments. If you inspect the (...) (23 years ago, 17-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: The use of type 5 lines for smoothing of objects.
 
You were right about the strange reflections. By accident I had put my light source behind the scene and had the facing flipped. Now I have put a directional light straight at the scene with 'non viewer dependant' specular highlighting. This looks (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

22 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR