 | | Re: "Mission to Mars" Elongated Visor and "Martian" heads.
|
|
(...) Is this the cockpit part your are referring to? #30536 (URL) is currently in process... (...) Sorry, I don't have any of the others. Paul (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Do I use Dat2AutoCAD or is there a better way?
|
|
(...) On second thought, I am working on another project in which it might be handy to have that converter. So I think I'll go with it. --Ryan (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Advice please on DATs for bendy-arm holder 2x2 brick
|
|
I am almost ready to post dat file(s) for the 2x2 brick used to hold the bendy-arms in classic space and maxifigs. It is composed of two separate pieces which clip together (neither of my examples have embossed part numbers). My question is - should (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | "Mission to Mars" Elongated Visor and "Martian" heads.
|
|
To any of whom it may concern: I am looking for the following LCAD parts: "Mission to Mars" enlongated cockpit. "Mission to Mars" alien heads (They fit onto SW: Episode I Battle Droid torsos.) "Mission to Mars" alien legs. (They also fit onto Battle (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Do I use Dat2AutoCAD or is there a better way?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the info. I did get help about ten days ago regarding this. I ended up being able to do what I wanted all in POV-Ray. But if ever I need that utility, now I know where to get it. Cheers, --Ryan (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Do I use Dat2AutoCAD or is there a better way?
|
|
There's a DAT2DXF converter I have. Its a bit slow for larger models, but for your application it should work just fine. Let me know if you want it -Orion (24 years ago, 25-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Part numbers master list ?
|
|
(...) It is the same. I'm still adding things to it as I come across numbers that are not present in the list. Might be a good idea to 'diff' the nxt version against the prev one to pick out the changes. (...) Cool. Ray (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Rebel helmet
|
|
(...) Nope, not yet. Someone has already requested it, though... (Copied from Tore's parts tracker): Wanted 2000-Aug-21 Unknown Minifig Star Wars Rebel Helmet (Luke) N/A Andrew (Please notice "follow-up" re-direct.) Hope this helps. Franklin (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part numbers master list ?
|
|
took me a while to notice this thread (since I just subscribed to cad.dev), but here's my comments. (...) that's actually Jennifer's list, with me helping to update it... and it is updated almost daily... we combined it from a few lists I found on (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part 30183 and 30283
|
|
(...) Since it looks like a minature ships hull (mid-section), how about ... 30283 - 'Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double Inverted (Hull)' Ray (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: part 30183 and 30283
|
|
(...) Should the names be different? Yes and no. Both names are accurate, and I haven't thought of a *short* tag which would differentiate the names (I'm open to suggestions). Looking at these parts, I'd think 30283 should have the special notation, (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | part 30183 and 30283
|
|
I was just looking at part 30283 (a real one). Apparently there is a dat file, but it has not yet propagated to partsref. This message (URL) gives a name for 30283 of 'Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double Inverted' partsref lists the name for <part:30183> as (...) (24 years ago, 19-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) Another thing to keep in mind: we're seeing the results of a system changing over time. It appears that TLC has changed its part-numbering strategy at least twice over the years, with some other minor adjustments occuring along the way. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Chris Dee writes: <snips> (...) Correct. The actual mould number is probably the composite of the 4/5 digit number and the X-XX number (usually first appears as 1-01). I would guess that the X-XX number has to do with the actual (...) (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) This just in: there's a light gray 4x4 dish from the Life on Mars Red Mecha (sorry, I don't have the number handy). It has a part number: 3960. I guess that goes toward supporting my note of caution: (...) Steve (24 years ago, 18-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) 1-n (...) present (...) we (...) of (...) not (...) In the main, I think they really are part numbers, considering the total number of parts there are very few exceptions, which I think can be explained by 1) some technical need for separate (...) (24 years ago, 16-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes: <snippage> (...) All along we have been using these numbers as 'part numbers', when actually they appear to be a mould number. What we are finding here is that there are 1-n mould numbers for each 'part shape'. (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) p/n (...) angle. (...) is (...) Good analysis, Steve - I agree wholeheartedly - Chris (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) Right. I'd rather have one file be a standard part file, and the other be a "shortcut" type file, meaning that the part name would be prepended with an underscore. I think we should *not* declare either the opaque or the transparent numbers to (...) (24 years ago, 15-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) part (...) just (...) piece (...) no (...) piece (...) So, IMHO this makes them different parts, although at present the DAT file language does not have the capability to define textured surfaces. But, if we're making a catalog, 2507 - (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Diablo-style RPG?
|
|
I meant Diablo-style in the sense that it utilizes a top-down, 2.5D view (easy to do using LDraw. not so tough). I know where you can get the engine. You can think up whaterver type plot you want, I'd just like to see some interest in this. (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) Heres another data point for the list... 'Hinge Panel 2 x 4 x 3 & 1/3' which partsref lists as 2582, a trans-green piece has 6139 as the mould number. Oddly, a light-grey part (from Gungan Sub) has no visible mould number on it. Another (...) (24 years ago, 14-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ? [DAT]
|
|
(...) marked (...) I think we should have a dat file for each number, so that if you read the part number from the part it is obvious whether or not a .dat file exists). One just needs to be a type 1 command to the other file. eg. 0 Container Box 2 (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) I've seen this before but did not realize what was happening. The 'Container Box 2 x 2 x 2 Door with Slot' p/n 4346 in Light Grey (from Tie & Y-Wing) is marked 4346. The same part in Trans-Green (from 6180 Hydro Search Sub) is marked 30059. (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Adding an image_map (used to be Re: Do I use Dat2AutoCAD or is there a better way?)
|
|
(...) but I've seen it done. (...) I did some experimenting with this last night, and I couldn't get it to work. I don't know where to put the image_map command to add the image. I have this object: object { _screen_ } And I want to put this image (...) (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) Yes. Steve (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) Ok, that begs a question that I've been wanting to ask: what is the natural color of ABS ? Transparent/Clear ? Second question: what is the additive that gives us different colors ? Ray fut to .general (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) I've been told LEGO has different molds for transparent bricks because of shrinkage. (24 years ago, 13-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) Is it safe to say that the image that we have for 6259 is identical (for our purposes) to the part moulded as 6218 ? Ray (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) partsref (...) difference (...) I was able to lay my hands on 5 ClrDkBlue parts and all are marked 6259. And the grey ones on my Y-wing are 6218. IIRC the UFO quarter saucers used different mould numbers for the clear and opaque versions of (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Do I use Dat2AutoCAD or is there a better way?
|
|
POV-Ray can use bitmaps as surface textures. I've never done this myself, but I've seen it done. -John Van "Ryan Farrington" <ryanjf@ifriendly.com> wrote in message news:002501c0ab09$c8...dly.com... (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: shortcut - completed palm tree
|
|
(...) I can get you some more numbers... (...) "Palmtree.dat" works for me. Steve (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
(...) Hmm, interesting. My half-cylinders from the Star Wars Y-Wing are also 6218's. I wonder if this is a situation where there are two different molds for opaque and transparent pieces. Does anyone have some transparent pieces to check? I can (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Do I use Dat2AutoCAD or is there a better way?
|
|
For a project I am working on, I need a picture of a datapad (which I posted to .models) with text displayed on its screen (and I don't mean a perfect front view). I rendered the model in POV-Ray, but have no idea of how to get the text on it, (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: shortcut - completed palm tree
|
|
Franklin, Well, I just called it "palmtree.dat" but since there is not an "official" part number for it, what about something starting with 25, since all the individual parts start with 25? Just an idea, and a scillie one I might add. Or, we could (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: shortcut - completed palm tree
|
|
(...) Oops... This should read "palmtre6.dat" and "six trunk segments", respectively... Plz. be nice, I've had a sinus migraine all day. :-/ Thanks, Franklin (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: shortcut - completed palm tree
|
|
(...) When I sent this one in (to Steve), I called it "x479.dat", but I'm wondering what we'll rename this short-cut. (_Especially_ since I'm _critically_ low on "temporary" part numbers; of the numbers I was given -- 460, and 462 thru 479 -- I've (...) (24 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Whats the difference between 6218 and 6259 ?
|
|
I have a half cylinder 6218 in front of me. It looks exactly like the partsref image for 6259. Partsref does not have an entry for 6218. The parts list from peeron.com identifies both as 'Cylinder 2 x 4 x 4'. Anyone know the difference between these (...) (24 years ago, 9-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number for baseplate?
|
|
(...) Like this (URL) ? As used in set 264 and others. Chris (24 years ago, 7-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part number for baseplate?
|
|
(...) your example is definitely the right idea. Thanks! Dave! (24 years ago, 6-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
