Subject:
|
Re: part 30183 and 30283
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:57:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
718 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Ray Sanders wrote:
>
> > I was just looking at part 30283 (a real one). Apparently there is a dat file,
> > but it has not yet propagated to partsref.
> >
> > This message <http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/parts/?n=1620> gives a name for
> > 30283 of 'Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double Inverted'
> >
> > partsref lists the name for <part:30183> as 'Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double
> > Inverted'
> >
> > These parts are different (from looking at the partsref picture for 30183 and at
> > the 30283 that I have. Should the names be different ? The primary difference
> > seems to be that the center 4 x 4 area of 30283 is similar to a plate (only one
> > plate thinckness), whereas 30183 has a raised area in the center.
>
> Should the names be different? Yes and no. Both names are accurate, and I
> haven't thought of a *short* tag which would differentiate the names (I'm
> open to suggestions). Looking at these parts, I'd think 30283 should have
> the special notation, as it is less like a 'regular' slope brick than
> 30183. But all the other "airplane fuselage bottom" pieces use the "double
> inverted" notation.
>
> Steve
Since it looks like a minature ships hull (mid-section), how about ...
30283 - 'Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double Inverted (Hull)'
Ray
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: part 30183 and 30283
|
| (...) Should the names be different? Yes and no. Both names are accurate, and I haven't thought of a *short* tag which would differentiate the names (I'm open to suggestions). Looking at these parts, I'd think 30283 should have the special notation, (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
