Subject:
|
Re: Parts 30283 and 32083
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:48:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1011 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> Hi, I was using the 30283 part posted here by Tore Eriksson (listed as 20283
> in the subject header, posted originally on 04/01/00: any idea why this
> wasn't in the last update?) ...
It wasn't in the update because it was never submitted.
> ... , as well as the 32083 mockup posted by Franklin
> W. Cain on 09/03/00, and I noticed that the two parts are rotated 90 degrees
> around the Y axis relative to each other.
>
> Given that 32083 is the Slope Brick 45 4 x 6 Double and 30283 is the Slope
> Brick 45 4 x 6 Double Inverted, I think these should have the same
> orientation. Is there a reason they shouldn't?
All slopes should be oriented so the primary slope face is 'facing' the Z-
axis -- so 30283 is OK, 32083 should be rotated.
Also, the names would need to change to:
30283.DAT Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double Inverted
32083.DAT Slope Brick 45 6 x 4 Double
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Parts 30283 and 32083
|
| "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:16sjtssra2bupmr...4ax.com... (...) 20283 (...) Logical enough: Tore, do you plan to submit 30283 for the next update? (hint, hint ;-) --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@san.REMOVE.rr.com) (24 years ago, 4-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Parts 30283 and 32083
|
| Hi, I was using the 30283 part posted here by Tore Eriksson (listed as 20283 in the subject header, posted originally on 04/01/00: any idea why this wasn't in the last update?), as well as the 32083 mockup posted by Franklin W. Cain on 09/03/00, and (...) (24 years ago, 2-Oct-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
