Subject:
|
Re: Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 18:19:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1862 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999 16:04:27 GMT, Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> > Right. New programs may handle transparency either way, so the extensions
> > to the description language shouldn't assume which way to go. Plus, the
> > description language usually doesn't know the color/transparency, so we
> > can't assign the CLIPPING setting in the language anyway.
>
> Not exactly!
> If the color has any transparency, force CLIPPING OFF, irrespective of
> what the file TAGS inform.
Right. But that happens at rendering time, not in the description
language.
> (SIDE NOTE)
> when using the tag
>
> 0 CLIPPING ON
>
> you are not informing the program that it MUST do clipping, but instead
> you are saying that it SHOULD clip if he know how. That's one of the
> reasons why this is compatible with LDRAW (it's a comment!).
I knew that. ;)
> > > To use this features, in a similar way, will simplify the making (or
> > > appending) of a program written in OpenGL, and probably D3D (since they
> > > use something similar).
> >
> > True, but the translation is fairly straightforward.
>
> Yes it is, but think of me like a polition. ;)
> Enlighten only what is relevant to your cause!
LOL
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT
|
| (...) touche'! (...) Not exactly! If the color has any transparency, force CLIPPING OFF, irrespective of what the file TAGS inform. (SIDE NOTE) when using the tag 0 CLIPPING ON you are not informing the program that it MUST do clipping, but instead (...) (27 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
