Subject:
|
Re: Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 18:00:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
589 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 8 Oct 1999 16:09:21 GMT, Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Steve Bliss wrote:
>
> > 0 WINDING [CW|CCW|UNKNOWN]
> > 0 CLIPPING [ON|OFF|ENABLED|DISABLED|0|1|-1]
>
> I don't need the WINDING UNKNOWN, since it's redundant with CLIPPING OFF.
> When clipping is OFF you don't care the state of the winding.
I put in WINDING UNKNOWN because it explicitly states that the winding is
unknown (and probably bad). This way, you can effectively disable clipping
for a particular section of (unchecked) code, without having to force
clipping back on at the end of the code. This is a good thing, because
clipping may have been off before the questionable section.
> I am curious, what is CLIPPING -1 ? an UNKNOWN, CLIPPING when not found
> is assumed as OFF (the safe side), no UNKNOWN needed either.
CLIPPING ON
CLIPPING 1
CLIPPING -1
CLIPPING YES
CLIPPING TRUE
CLIPPING ENABLED
all mean the same thing.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT
|
| (...) I don't need the WINDING UNKNOWN, since it's redundant with CLIPPING OFF. When clipping is OFF you don't care the state of the winding. I am curious, what is CLIPPING -1 ? an UNKNOWN, CLIPPING when not found is assumed as OFF (the safe side), (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
