Subject:
|
Re: Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 15:35:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
503 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999 18:15:40 GMT, Rui Martins <Rui.Martins@link.pt> wrote:
Follow-up note: the more I look at this, the more I like using WINDING /
CLIPPING instead of FACE. For reasons listed by Rui, for more flexibility,
for the ability to enable clipping without specifying the winding.
I see two possible approaches:
0 FACE [CW|CCW|DS|UNKNOWN]
or
0 WINDING [CW|CCW|UNKNOWN]
0 CLIPPING [ON|OFF|ENABLED|DISABLED|0|1|-1]
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT
|
| (...) I don't need the WINDING UNKNOWN, since it's redundant with CLIPPING OFF. When clipping is OFF you don't care the state of the winding. I am curious, what is CLIPPING -1 ? an UNKNOWN, CLIPPING when not found is assumed as OFF (the safe side), (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Clipping / CCW / CW / INVERT [DAT]
|
| First, let me apologise, if you get this message twice. It seams that the old e-Mail address (L-CAD@LISTSERV.UH.EDU) does not work completelly. Because I got the message back, but couldn't see it in www.lugnet.com/cad/dev note: i am subscribed in (...) (25 years ago, 6-Oct-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
