| |
Adam Howard wrote:
>
> Hi Joshua,
> >
> > Traditional procedure would be to submit to Terry, and let the Numbers
> > Group provide the number (if possible).
> >
> > -- joshua
>
> Thanks for the information.
No problem, you're welcome.
> I've submitted it to Terry, hopefully it will
> be in the next vote.
I'm certain it will be.
> PS. Glad to have you back :)
Yeah, well... :-)
a) I overstated things just a _bit_ to Todd. I *have* all but stopped
reading LUGNET unless and until there's a new vote in which case Terry
wakes me up and drags me back :-P, (and this was caused by Jonathan's
overzealous posting habits making for too much noise to wade through)
but those times usually cause me to take a pretty good look around until
I duck under for the next hibernation period, so I'm not entirely
disconnected, just mostly so.
b) I just _had_ to come see what the hub-bub was about; since Todd asked
permission to quote the personal e-mail. I ended up catching up a few
threads today that were up my alley.
To get this (slightly) back on topic, I can tell you that we (the
Numbers group) will have a number for that element, in case you were
curious.
-- joshua
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
31 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
