Subject:
|
Re: Parts editing made easy, anyone?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 09:26:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2124 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Jindrich Kubec wrote:
>
> So basically the question stands: I somebody submits .DAT file with,
> say, 3000 lines, without any special ldraw features, which provides
> _perfect_ render - would it be accepted (on better-than-nothing policy)
> or denied (on purity-or-nothing polity)?
>
> Jindroush
(I'm going to try not to sound like a jilted lover here, bear with me)
If you're not already a parts author, you have to ask for permission to submit a
part to the Parts Tracker. I've been told translated-from-other-CAD (i.e. messy)
parts won't be accepted. I understand the reasons - unless someone volunteers to
clean up the parts they will just draw negative comments from reviewers and may
be counter-productive - but it was kind of disheartening. I turned around and
dragged my rejected parts home, in the rain.. :)
Now this doesn't take into account how much demand there is for the part. For
something like BBB wheels, obviously there's some demand from the LDraw
community, and if a "real" parts author decides to fix and submit it, there you
go. If you're already an author, I suppose you could just submit the part and
see what happens.
Otherwise - a nice translator would be VERY appreciated. (picturing a fuzzy
movie scene where CAD and LDraw run across a flowery field and embrace each
other while cheesy music plays)
Darrell
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts editing made easy, anyone?
|
| (...) I should probably find then for what is LDraw library aimed at. If it's something like as perfect as possible renders or some quick mockup prototyping. (...) Wouldn't it be possible to be the parts as accurate as possible and then (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
