 | | PT Suggestion
|
|
Dan mentioned an idea to me, but he's letting me post about it. Probably because I was the one who wanted to see what other people think. On the review results page (you know, the little page that says you posted a review successfully), would be (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Another PT Suggestion
|
|
(...) Good idea. I was working on something like this, a way to search the activity log, but I got distracted. Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Another PT Suggestion
|
|
I'd like to see a Parts I've Submitted page. This way I can keep track of what I've submitted and respond to comments quicker. -Orion (22 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) By "hack", I just meant that someone could view the message page, save the HTML source to their hard drive, and modify the fields in the form to allow them to input userid and subject line. In order to use this hacked form, they'd still need (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) Sounds good to me. If someone does hack it, we need to get it reported. Then we can disable it for awhile. Paul (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) Yes, we would not display the destination email address, just the destination Parts Tracker userid. Good idea on the fixed subject line. Although it wouldn't be hard to hack the form, if the locking is just enforced by the HTML code. Steve (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: are you sure?
|
|
(...) That works for me. Steve (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) I'd definitely want the destination address locked, probably not even displayed (just the name / user code), and a fixed subject line, too eg "Review of part xxxx", to disuade people from using it for anything other than PT email. ROSCO (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) a (...) way (...) As a reviewer, I personally would not have a problem with this. Cheers, --Ryan Amateur radio call sign: kb1fob E-mail: ryanjf@ifriendly.com Website: (URL) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: disabling BFC (was "Head w/ Headset Over Brown Hair")
|
|
(...) Hey, that's pretty neat! You should get in touch with this LDraw.org I've heard about; you could be like an advisor or something... Thanks for your help! Dave! (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: are you sure? [DAT]
|
|
(...) (subpart 1 is my frontside, subpart 2 is just the color gold) (...) you sure that this will work? (...) Personally, I would prefer just a single level of nesting, like this 0 Brick 1 x 2 with Classic Space Logo Pattern 0 Name: 3004p90.dat 0 (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: numbers report - 25 June 2002
|
|
(...) Gosh, no; I haven't thought about it at all. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: are you sure?
|
|
(...) This would work, but isn't it a little bit strange? I think you should make only the 2nd subpart for the gold surfaces. The pattern you can make in a Subpart in the main directory (like a real part). See 80.dat or other Subparts in the main (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) I'm thinking of a simple system, where the PT will send an email on the behalf of a logged in user. One webpage, with just a few fields: ToUser (already filled in, maybe locked), Subject, and Message. Maybe with an "include my email address" (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: disabling BFC (was "Head w/ Headset Over Brown Hair") [DAT]
|
|
(...) Try: 0 BFC INVERTNEXT 1 16 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 10 2-4cyli.dat Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question about subparts
|
|
(...) As others have said, you *must* put the gold areas into a separate subfile from the rest. But you can still have a subfile for the entire pattern, that you can use in multiple parts. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | are you sure? [DAT]
|
|
(...) sounds weird. just to make it clear that I got it right. both subparts (subpart 1 is my frontside, subpart 2 is just the color gold) go in the parts\s-folder and the 3004p90.dat part would look like this: 0 Brick 1 x 2 with Classic Space Logo (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [Parts Tracker] New Parts Admin!
|
|
Some of you sharp-eyed reviewers *might* have noticed this already... A few weeks ago, Chris Dee and I were emailing back and forth, and (if I remember right) he volunteered to help with admin type duties on the Parts Tracker. Because of various (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers Minifig Reference
|
|
(...) Harumph. It appears that someone forgot to click "save" after he keyed in all those filenames. So I guess the splat isn't so redundant after all. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers Minifig Reference
|
|
(...) i used it to mark minifigs that already had one or more files submitted to the tracker. It's somewhat redundant -- existing files are listed; if the full file name isn't given, then it doesn't exist yet. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | numbers report - 25 June 2002
|
|
"(URL) Totals 74 certified files. 152 files need admin review. <---[1] 187 files need more votes. 226 have uncertified subfiles. 121 held files. (760 files total...) [1]. Steve? Need some help? :-( Have you thought about recruiting some "jr." admins (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: can L3P have option to *NOT* give warning for "emphasis lines"?
|
|
Lars, I just wanted a way of letting a novice know that a color-16 line _might_ not be an _accident_ on the part of the author. A novice reviewer probably hasn't read your FAQ, and is just using the "File Check" option from the "Tools" page at the (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question about subparts
|
|
(...) What he said... ;-) The _ONLY_ legitimate way to handle dithered colors is with a type-1 (sub)file reference. Thus, you _must_ have one separate (sub)file for each dithered color to be used in a specific pattern. (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question about subparts
|
|
(...) Yes you have to, else you wouldn't need subparts for dittered colors. CU Bernd (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Adventurers Minifig Reference
|
|
(...) Steve, What's the splat ("*") for? Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Adventurers Minifig Reference (was: Re: how many distinct patterns for Adventurers?...)
|
|
I've put this information into an FTX page, with pattern codes pre-assigned for all Adventurers minifigs. It's at: (URL) take a look, at let me know about any corrections that need to be made! In particular, I could not find the US names for all of (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: question about subparts [DAT]
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Willy Tschager writes: now, regarding (...) it would be best to have it so all the dithered colors are in a subfile. on the file being used with the subfile the part is the dithered color. IE.. 0 part (gold detail) 0 (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: disabling BFC (was "Head w/ Headset Over Brown Hair") [DAT]
|
|
(...) Testify, brother. I totally blindsided myself when I downloaded the newest batch of primitives and all of my hard-wrought DAT's appeared sort of skeletal. After I was done freaking out, I realized what it probably was, but I definitely don't (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | question about subparts [DAT]
|
|
hi folks, the other day I posted a hires series of bricks with classic space logos, but before I send them to steve I've got some questions about subparts. in an e-mail bernd broich suggested to use a unique subpart, which also sounds reasonable to (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: can L3P have option to *NOT* give warning for "emphasis lines"?
|
|
Franklin W. Cain wrote... (...) In the release notes for "Version 1.2 20000616" I wrote: ((URL) common mistake is to reference lines with color 16 instead of color 24, so L3P now warns about this. The only legitimate example I have seen is in (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) Sounds like a good idea, although that might be a lot of work. . . (...) Well, actually I'd say that a better example of this is the way Ebay *used* to handle messaging: you click a link, fill out a form with your message and password (to (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.market.services)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) That's exactly what I would like to see. A button or hyperlink that says something to the effect of "Send the Reviewer a message", then a page with a message box would pop up. This way the Email addresses would be kept private but we could (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) That would be useful. Jacob (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) Good idea. How about other email notification - like if the author submits a new version, so your review is overturned? Steve (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) I'm not disagreeing, but this would require agreement from all reviewers. Some people don't want their email addresses to be published. What's more likely is that we'll add functionality in the parts tracker to send messages from one user to (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Tried it, and I like it.
|
|
After being a part of the LEGO online community since 1996, I have finally got around to trying ldraw....and I must say it's very impressive. Not only is ldraw itself great, but all the utilities and extra goodies are perfect. It's hard to imagine (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | can L3P have option to *NOT* give warning for "emphasis lines"?
|
|
Lars, I have a request. Is there some way that L3P can "know" not to "cry wolf" whenever it encounters emphasis lines (i.e., same-color type-2 lines inside of quads and triangles)? Every month or so, it seems, I have to go through the process of (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Tracker FAQ: where is "emphasis lines" documented?
|
|
Steve, What is the URL (with anchor-name) for the explanation of "emphasis lines" (i.e., the same-color type-2 lines inside quads and triangles). I _know_ I've asked this before, but I can't find the post on LUGNet... Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part recycling question
|
|
(...) It depends on what kind of problems your running into... Steve (22 years ago, 23-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: ** QUAD2DAT ** version 0.9.4 released **
|
|
Hi Chris, I've given quad2dat a try in creating a few parts, and I thought I'd post a list of bugs i've encountered and some suggestions. But first, I just want to say that it is *so* much easier to do a pattern with this program than by hand. It (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
