 | | Re: 2x2 plate with wings?
|
|
(...) yes i am going to start it soon (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
(...) Yes I only REALLY need set 1, Set 2 is just to make the builing instructions, move stuff around and ensure that all is okay but it never gets distributed. (...) Yes.. in some case all 'submodels - files referenced by compelete.ldr show up) and (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
(...) quick (...) [x-posted to .mlcad] In MLCad v.2.12, you can select a step, click Edit>Select>Same Items ("Select Same Items" on the movement bar), and press delete! HTH, --Ryan Amateur radio call sign: kb1fob E-mail: ryanjf@ifriendly.com (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | 2x2 plate with wings?
|
|
Is anyone working on the new 2x2 plate with wings that comes in the Racers sets? Can't see it in the Parts Tracker... it's this one: (URL) tan facade kit, 427 pieces! (URL) TOWN PLANNING information: (URL) Lego parts store: (URL) Guild of (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
Ahui Herrera wrote... (...) I think we have been talking past each other, especially about what a submodel is, and when it is a submodel. You seem to think of a submodel as being a certain file, and always call it submodel no matter it is rendered (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
(...) It would be a solution. Basically in the end I would have 2 set of files: Set 1: for distribution model.mpd (which is made of) complete.ldr submodel1.ldr submodel2.ldr Note that ALL of these files would have their steps IN THEM! So that a user (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
LeoCad can do that sort of thing - but not very straightforward, here is the procedure: - Rename your sub-model as .dat (LeoCad doesn't properly support .dat extension) - Open it with Leocad - Select all parts (edit/select all) and Copy (Ctrl-C) - (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
(...) Would that solve all your problems? You always want to ignore steps in submodels when rendering main model? Do you render submodels separately for BI ? /Lars (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
(...) I start off by making one ldraw model first. Usually it has no steps and parts are in NO particular order. Once I got the model done, I go back and begin to figure out what sections should be sub-models if any. At this point I begin to build (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
(...) But don't you make separate building instructions for the submodels ? The way stepclock works today isn't well suited for models containing submodels with steps. If a model includes a submodel in step 3 it will include step 1-3 of the submodel (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
(...) This works BUT ONLY if you are NOT doing building instructions of the submodels as well? I'm making builing instructions for the submodels as well so this option is NOT an option for me. =( AHui (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: disabling BFC (was "Head w/ Headset Over Brown Hair")
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote... (...) In the coming version of L3Lab I have added a check to see if the model contains any linetype 2, 3, 4 or 5. If so, the "model" is assumed to be a part/primitive, and BFC is disabled. (BFC is of course enabled for a (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
Ahui Herrera wrote... (...) Or simply ALWAYS ONLY put stepclock in the main model ? Since L3P doesn't walk the model/part tree (POV does) it doesn't make much sense putting stepclocks in submodels. /Lars (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Self-Certification in parts tracker
|
|
(...) I think I would, but just having the choice between only the first 20 entries (default) and all the entries (optional) would be helpful. Jacob (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | ldraw.org going off-line for a few minutes
|
|
I hope that you will be patient, while I take LDraw.org off-line to move the server to a new location. It should only take a few minutes. Play well, Jacob (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | pressing keys causes LDGLite to step
|
|
Sorry, I lost the message to which I was supposed to reply, but the odd key pressing behavior in LDGLite is not gone in 0.9.5c. Strangely, pressing the 'q' keys causes two steps to step by while most other keys, the 'j' key for example, does what (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | L3P and/or L3PAO
|
|
Not sure which author would be willing to do this if any? Currenlty L3P/L3PAO when using the -sc (stepclock) function will allow a user to render the model by the number of steps (each step = 1 image) in your .ldr file. This is a WONDERFUL tool but (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Steve's not available right now...
|
|
Hello! LOL... if you haven't noticed.. there are more than one hundred parts to be admin-reviewed ;) Play well Carsten ;) "Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:Gxuzu3.4ov@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Steve's not available right now...
|
|
Just a quick note, I'm going to be offline line most of this week. Don't have any wild parties while I'm gone, and try not to burn the place down. And I expect to see some serious part reviews when I get back! ;) Steve (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Voting Issue
|
|
(...) I think that the email addresses of the reviewers should also be available in case the part author has a question about a comment and needs to contact a part reviewer. -Orion (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
