Subject:
|
Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 03:33:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
384 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Lars C. Hassing writes:
> Ahui Herrera wrote...
> > Could there be away to have L3P/L3PAO have an additional flag/switch
> > say -scm (setpClock main model only) if which ONLY
> > the final model of the .ldr file gets clock command lines in it.
>
> Or simply ALWAYS ONLY put stepclock in the main model ?
> Since L3P doesn't walk the model/part tree (POV does)
> it doesn't make much sense putting stepclocks in submodels.
> /Lars
This works BUT ONLY if you are NOT doing building instructions of the
submodels as well? I'm making builing instructions for the submodels as
well so this option is NOT an option for me.
=(
AHui
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
| (...) But don't you make separate building instructions for the submodels ? The way stepclock works today isn't well suited for models containing submodels with steps. If a model includes a submodel in step 3 it will include step 1-3 of the submodel (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
|
| Ahui Herrera wrote... (...) Or simply ALWAYS ONLY put stepclock in the main model ? Since L3P doesn't walk the model/part tree (POV does) it doesn't make much sense putting stepclocks in submodels. /Lars (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
