To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 7354
7353  |  7355
Subject: 
Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:47:04 GMT
Viewed: 
400 times
  
Ahui Herrera wrote...
Could there be away to have L3P/L3PAO have an additional flag/switch
say -scm (setpClock main model only) if which ONLY
the final model of the .ldr file gets clock command lines in it.

Or simply ALWAYS ONLY put stepclock in the main model ?
Since L3P doesn't walk the model/part tree (POV does)
it doesn't make much sense putting stepclocks in submodels.
/Lars



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: L3P and/or L3PAO
 
(...) This works BUT ONLY if you are NOT doing building instructions of the submodels as well? I'm making builing instructions for the submodels as well so this option is NOT an option for me. =( AHui (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Message is in Reply To:
  L3P and/or L3PAO
 
Not sure which author would be willing to do this if any? Currenlty L3P/L3PAO when using the -sc (stepclock) function will allow a user to render the model by the number of steps (each step = 1 image) in your .ldr file. This is a WONDERFUL tool but (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jun-02, to lugnet.cad.dev)

13 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR