 | | Re: new part description changes?
|
|
(...) The new part, 32059, doesn't go with the other parts in the Wedge category. All of the wedges feature at least one side which is angled across 1x3 studs. 32059 has sides angled across 1x2 studs. There are several types of angle-sided plates in (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Comments
|
|
(...) That's a really great idea! It's obvious you're pretty experienced with LDraw. I'll do the changes when I get home. Fredrik (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Comments
|
|
(...) You are indeed correct, yes. Thanks a lot. I took the time to "brush up" the surface around the axle holes as well. I believe the current solution is a better one; I no longer use partially overlapping 2-4rings to cover the surface. The part (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page [DAT]
|
|
I've noticed an error in part #30250, that was named "Brick 2 x 4 x 3 Notched with Side 5 x 4 Plate" during the vote. Four box5.dat primitives have been used to form "friction rims" at the under/inside of the part, but they are not properly rotated. (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Name Question
|
|
jonathan wilson wrote in message ... (...) No, no more "space" required I think. A generic category like "bar" would be nicer. But I admit that there is no simple definition for "bar" category for this part like "space gun 1x8" Selçuk (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: new part description changes?
|
|
Terry K wrote in message <37422782.12164362@l...et.com>... (...) Any (...) Looks nice to me, too. (...) Corners", (...) I strongly agree. By the way, I don't think the part that Steve pointed out should be considered as "w/o corners" variety. It is (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Piece needed to finish MOC Naboo Fighter
|
|
(...) Yes, someone *please* do this. It has been on my wish list for ages. One of those "I can't believe it hasn't been done" pieces. (1) -- Terry K -- 1. FYI, the piece does exist in Lutz's L2P. (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part 2429
|
|
(...) No, you didn't miss something. I missed something. I thought I had carefully checked all number changes for conflicts with existing parts, but obviously, I didn't catch that one. 2429 was the Hinge Plate, released in the original LDraw (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Name Question
|
|
(...) i say space (...) space gun 1 x 8 dsounds good. (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: [makelist] mklist v1.2
|
|
(...) Consider it done. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: new part description changes?
|
|
(...) I favor this one as well. (...) I agree. And as Steve pointed out, there is precedence for "without Corners", whereas there is none for "Tapered". (...) Cow-like, I will follow this herd and agree. (...) Beat me to it! I was just going to say (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) Fix 'em. They all passed. -- Terry K -- (25 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Piece needed to finish MOC Naboo Fighter
|
|
I wasn't at all pleased with the Naboo Fighter set, so I redesigned it to more closely match the movie ship. I've finished the Ldraw File, but I'm missing one piece... I know it has been asked for before, but I don't remember if anybody ever (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
(...) yeah, i use UltraEdit 5 for all my text editing, it has some sweet search and replace options... it also has "column mode" where you can edit standard text files and make selections in area blocks rather than line "wraps".. everyone should (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Name Question
|
|
Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FBy0GA.6Lt@lugnet.com... (...) was (...) ;) (...) You're right, that was a pain. I think I worked in LDAO modeler just for that reason. -John Van (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Voting Page
|
|
onyx <onyx@flash.net> wrote in message news:FBxz98.4Hv@lugnet.com... (...) A simple search-and-replace on " 4 24 " to " 5 24 " is usually sufficient--as long as you don't use " 4 24 " in your coordinates. If you do, a stepping search-and-replace is (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Suggestion for part authors
|
|
(...) Good suggestion John. Something else for the QA process. I think I mentioned this before, but it would be real neat if there were a super-wireframe mode that rendered all optional lines. Any chance of this sometime in the future please, Paul ? (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Name Question
|
|
(...) Now that I think about it, it probably isn't necessary. I had a hard time positioning things on the end using John's mock-up, but I just realized it was probably because he was using one of the 'stud' primitives. So, Nevermind. ;) Jeff (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Name Question
|
|
(...) Hadn't thought about that. Is it that important to view a stud instead of a line in LEdit? Seems like this piece has a 'normal geometry', so that it wouldn't make sense to defeat the line-as-stud option. (...) Yes. Steve (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Suggestion for part authors
|
|
Just thought I'd mention that the wireframe view in LDLite is a great tool for part authors to check the edge lines and conditional lines in their parts before submission. Edge line omissions are usually much more obvious in this view, so take a (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
