Subject:
|
Re: Part Name Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 18 May 1999 19:21:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
707 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> On Tue, 18 May 1999 17:32:52 GMT, "Jeff Stembel" <Dragonelf1@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Will the 1x1 end of it use capitalization? (i.e. STUD.DAT)
>
> Hadn't thought about that. Is it that important to view a stud instead of
> a line in LEdit? Seems like this piece has a 'normal geometry', so that it
> wouldn't make sense to defeat the line-as-stud option.
Now that I think about it, it probably isn't necessary. I had a hard time
positioning things on the end using John's mock-up, but I just realized it was
probably because he was using one of the 'stud' primitives. So, Nevermind. ;)
Jeff
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Part Name Question
|
| Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FBy0GA.6Lt@lugnet.com... (...) was (...) ;) (...) You're right, that was a pain. I think I worked in LDAO modeler just for that reason. -John Van (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Part Name Question
|
| (...) Hadn't thought about that. Is it that important to view a stud instead of a line in LEdit? Seems like this piece has a 'normal geometry', so that it wouldn't make sense to defeat the line-as-stud option. (...) Yes. Steve (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
