Subject:
|
Re: new part description changes?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 May 1999 13:34:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
838 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 May 1999 06:39:52 GMT, "Selçuk <teyyareci>"
<sgore@nospam.superonline.com> wrote:
> Terry K wrote in message <37422782.12164362@lugnet.com>...
> > On Tue, 18 May 1999 16:46:24 GMT, "Adviesbureau Noord/Zuidlijn"
> > > > > 32059.dat http://hugin.ldraw.org/JJ_Memorial/voting/32059.gif
> > > > > Current Description: Plate 4 x 6 without Corners
> > > > > New suggestion: Plate 4 x 6 Tapered
> > >
> > > Me being a NENS (No English Native Speaker) "without Corners" sounds more
> > > familiar to me than "Tapered".
> >
> > I agree. And as Steve pointed out, there is precedence for "without
> > Corners", whereas there is none for "Tapered".
>
> I strongly agree. By the way, I don't think the part that Steve pointed out
> should be considered as "w/o corners" variety. It is simply memeber of the
> "wedge" system.
The new part, 32059, doesn't go with the other parts in the Wedge category.
All of the wedges feature at least one side which is angled across 1x3
studs. 32059 has sides angled across 1x2 studs.
There are several types of angle-sided plates in LDraw:
Boat Bow Plate
Plate ... Octagonal
Plate ... without Corner(s)
Wedge ... Plate
Wing
Out of all of these parts, I think 32059 is *most* similar to 2419, the
Plate 3 x 6 without Corners. My second choice would be to name 32059 as
Wing 6 x 4.
Steve
PS. On my computer, I've moved all bricks with angled sides to the Wedge
category, especially the 'facet bricks' and the Space Cabin Nose Base. All
angle-sided plates go in Wings.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: new part description changes?
|
| (...) out (...) I mean the quote taken from your previous message: "Another, somewhat similar, piece is the famous '3x4 notched trapezoid'. Unfortunately, this piece has a wholly dissimilar name: 4859.DAT Wedge 3 x 4 Plate" I just wanted to mean (...) (26 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: new part description changes?
|
| Terry K wrote in message <37422782.12164362@l...et.com>... (...) Any (...) Looks nice to me, too. (...) Corners", (...) I strongly agree. By the way, I don't think the part that Steve pointed out should be considered as "w/o corners" variety. It is (...) (26 years ago, 19-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
