 | | Re: [makelist] mklist v1.0 ready for testing
|
|
(...) I'll bet. (...) I *think* having lines which are too long doesn't matter (much). Lines which are too short are evil, because LEdit doesn't clean up the display list, it just overwrites the contents of the screen. (...) Yes -- all the subparts (...) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Primitives HTML Guide
|
|
Whatever happened to the write-up on the p\ primitives? Steve (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: How does the inliner tool handle the colours 16 and 24?
|
|
(...) Yes, the table is hard-coded into the Inliner. It uses just the low-nybble of the color value to look up the value for color 24: // iColorMain is the value for color code 16 // iEdgeColor will hold the value for color code 24 // Array is a (...) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
(...) You could generate a random height-grid, to represent the broken side of the neo-part. Use that information as a mesh, and convert it to LDraw code. Steve (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) Yes, it is supposed to by yyyy-mm-dd. No, it isn't supposed to be an/the ISO format. I'm glad it is, though. (...) Good -- then no one will be confused. Steve (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | [makelist] mklist v1.0 ready for testing
|
|
(URL) the name was the hardest part :-) Lines are (like James' makelist) restricted to 78 characters. However, it seems that LEdit is able handle 79 characters. Should I expand parts.lst from 78 to 79 characters? Should it be an option? Besides the (...) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) Yes. I presume it is supposed to be the ISO format (yyyy-mm-dd). (...) Not that I know of. Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- LDraw FAQ: <URL:(URL) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
Scott wrote in message <36C7347F.65378519@a...te.net>... (...) Hmmm. Ask and ye shall recieve. How did you implement the design. I've looked at it and have not decided how to handle the area between the loop and the plate. Do you remove the (...) (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
I have sort of already modelled this piece in LDraw. I use it all the time as a connector for my fire houses(shoe lace and flexi rubber Lego ones). Ryan (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Number for "Technic Friction Peg with Towball"?
|
|
i also made this part the other day but as yours is better i will abandon it. (26 years ago, 14-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
(...) I have one of those. :) Jasper (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | How does the inliner tool handle the colours 16 and 24?
|
|
How does the inliner tool handle the colours 16 and 24 in parts that are inlined? Ok, 16 is pretty obvious, simply substitute 16 with the colour of the part to be inlined. But 24? Does the inliner need a table of the conversions? I'm just curious. (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Number for "Technic Friction Peg with Towball"? [DAT]
|
|
Strangely (since it is an easy part), noone has made the Technic Friction Peg with Towball yet. So I made a draft for that part (included below). However, I cannot find any number for it. Anybody know? Fredrik 0 Technic Friction Peg with Towball 0 (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
Actually, I already have one of these. :/ Haven't modeled it in L-Draw though so maybe I'd better shut up before this thread gets sent to one o' them off-topic groups. Doug (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) made (...) Okay, Todd, point taken. Push the envelope too hard and its bound to burst ;-}. Don't you think milling the studs to .01" and microgrinding the excess would work better? Oh, and apply some toulene (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
(...) I feel a sudden urge coming on to take a batch of 1x10 plates to the belt sander and make 1x10 tiles. Then I'll shave off the stud on a classic smiley and have a realistic Jean-Luc Picard head. He'll need to sit in a comfy reclining chair, so (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Non-TLG Parts
|
|
Okay, I think I see the consensus on "home made" parts in LDraw. How about a slightly different twist? One of the messages in build group mentioned he used the loops off of broken 1 X 1 with side loops to get a female to female connection. Would it (...) (26 years ago, 14-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Proper tiles (Was: Clone "semi-bricks" (Was: Non-TLG Parts))
|
|
(...) Actually, this adds weight to our recent use of subpart files for the non- decorated sections of parts which are frequently decorated. If this had been done from the start (no criticism implied) we would now only have to "fix" the subparts - (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Maintenance Idea
|
|
(...) A couple of occasions. Not much can be done about it. It requires that any person who had used that part in a model to go back and manually update it to the correct number. (...) As far as the 3-digit (or less) numbers in LDraw goes, I try to (...) (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: DOS Makelist (was Re: Uber-install (was Re: Organizing the Si te Revamp))
|
|
(...) And please remember to "pad" the right side out to the same width as the current parts.lst file has - it is fixed at 79 characters width. If you don't, the parts view in LEdit gets real messy. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
