 | | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) It's a change to the acceptance criteria for the official library, which is somewhat stricter than the file spec. For example, 0 WRITE meta commands are legal in regular LDraw files but not in official library parts. -Orion (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
Question: what to do with 'hold' votes based upon the old policy? Good work! Jan Folkersma (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Flexible axles with lsynth [DAT]
|
|
Hello, I am currently unable to create flexible axles using lsynth and end piece LS40. I was wondering if anyone has been able to achieve this. This is the code that will not work with end part LS40 – 0 Untitled 0 Name: flex_axle.ldr 0 Author: MLCad (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
(...) I'm confused. Is this a change to the current LDraw.org file specifications (which I thought was 0.23) or part of the next LDraw.org file spec (which I thought was going to be 1.0)? The spec published on LDraw.org (URL) is not numbered at all) (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Change to existing policy regarding the subfiling of dithered colors
|
|
LSC has decided to do away with the requirement to transfer dithered color elements to dedicated subfiles. This was required due to a limitation in the original LDRAW.EXE. Due to the belief that James would have eventually fixed this problem and the (...) (20 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) So far it only looks like you're blocked from uploading new parts until you do, but i guess that doesn't apply to orphan parts. -NB (20 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) just out of curiosity. what will happen if: * an author does NOT agree * an author does NOT reply will his/her parts be deleted from the library and do we have to recreate them? w. (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) I hate to say that the MPD Update feature has some bugs. It works but it leaves orphan files. -Orion (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) I've updated my MPD program. Thanks for the feedback so far. Most notable is the MPD update feature. This feature strips an MPD of unoffical files made official (based on user input if prompting is selected). I also updated the interface a (...) (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) Woot! Good work guys! -gyug (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Mac MPD Utility 1.2.1
|
|
OK, I submitted my 1.2.1 update to MacUpdate. If you could update the versiontracker listing sometime, James, that'd be great. I appreciate it! No hurry either. (URL) new years! Jim (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
The LDraw.org Steering Committee is pleased to announce that the Jessiman family has given their consent to go forward with the LDraw.org Contributors Agreement. For those who don't remember, here is a link to the current version of the Contributor (...) (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !!
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) Yeah I though about that after the fact. I probably would have GPL'd the source anyway. -Orion (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) I hesitate to even mention it, but I thought it was only fair. Thanks for GPL'ing MPD Wizard, but if you are the original author of the LDDP code, I'm 99% sure you didn't have to do so. Even after you release something under GPL, you still own (...) (20 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Reporting on LDView for Mac OS X
|
|
(...) If anyone has an old Mac (running Mac OS X) they want to donate to me (or loan for an unknown timespan), I'll port it myself. I've never done any actual Cocoa programming, but I did OpenStep programming for 5 years at the same company as Alex (...) (20 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: more detailed Status (of File) in Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) And in the past, I believe replies have universally disagreed with your position. Just to be clear, let me restate my position: Blindly ignoring unofficial fixes to subfiles would allow the PT to certify files for release that reviewers would (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) That's a great suggestion. It gives me something to work on when I fly back home on Thursday. -Orion (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Mac MPD Utility 1.2.1
|
|
Hello folks! I'm pleased to announce Mac MPD Utility (MMU, to coin an acronym) has been updated to version 1.2.1, which adds a few new features and a bit of resilience to the 1.2 look. You can download this 50k behemoth at: (URL) metadata is fixed (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | more detailed Status (of File) in Parts Tracker?
|
|
Happy Holidays, Y'all! :D I have brought up, in the past, a point of concern I have with the Status displayed by the Parts Tracker. I have believed, and continue to believe, that a file's Status should be calculated *independently* of whatever (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MPD Wizard 1.0b
|
|
(...) Yes, as I didn't try to change it on the fly ;o) An optimisation that could be done would be to remove one of the two spaces before subfile names. To make MPDWizard the Swiss army knife of MPD, you could add a "Test MPD" function that would (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
