| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Ross Crawford wrote:
> Just to clarify, would these include the surface between the studs, or just
> the studs? I think logically they should include just the studs but just
> wanted to make sure.
Yeah, they'd be just the studs.
> > However, if there's truly a part-author demand for 1xN (and maybe 2xN)
> > stud-groups, I'm not totally opposed to them. But maybe we could call them
> > 'stud rows', instead of stud-groups? So they'd be stur*.dat files?
>
> Maybe, if that is a future possibility, the square ones should be named
> stus*.dat? As there may in future be demand for other (non-square) stud
> groups?
I'm not opposed to that; I don't see a compelling choice between stug* and
stus*.
Because I had files that used them, I went ahead and submitted stug3, stug4,
stug6 and stug8 to the PT. If people want stus* instead of stug*, please speak
up now. :)
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
| (...) Just to clarify, would these include the surface between the studs, or just the studs? I think logically they should include just the studs but just wanted to make sure. (...) Maybe, if that is a future possibility, the square ones should be (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
