| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> As an example, this part got a third as large as before with the new group
> primitives.
>
>
> 0 Brick 10 x 20
> 0 Name: 700.dat
> 0 Author: Tore Eriksson
> 0 Unofficial Updated Part
<SNIP>
It looks like there could be significant use of stud4 groups as well. I'm also
thinking that 1 x n rows of stud2 and stud 3 could be useful. Not as high in
demand, but the stud4 groups would be really nice. (The version of 700.dat
posted is now over half stud4 calls.) (For stug2, I think just a 2x2 and 1x4
would be all that is needed)
Would a naming convention of
stugNx-z.dat
be useful?
where
N is the corresponding stud type (underscore for stud.dat)
x and z are dimensions as before.
I'm just throwing out a suggestion for consideration. No need to act upon it,
just an idea. I like the idea of stud groups; I would just like it spread
universally,
John Riley
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
