To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitivesOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / Primitives / 315
314  |  316
Subject: 
Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives
Date: 
Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:05:35 GMT
Viewed: 
2424 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Chris Dee writes:
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Tore Eriksson writes:
Inspired by parts\s\4186a.dat, I would like to see "clusters" of studs, say
6 x 6 and 8 x 8. That would make a lot of part files *much* smaller.

Maybe we could call them Stud36.dat and Stud64.dat?

/Tore

In principle this sounds OK to me, but I would want to be somewhat restrictive
about how many new files we have - 4x4, 6x6, 8x8 sound good combinations. What
others?

Regarding a naming convention, though, do we know how all renderers recognise
STUDx primitives to do the STU2x substitution for fast-draw mode? To avoid any
conflict here, and to add further value to the name, how about something like
STUCx-z meaning Stud Cluster x by z. I dont see any value in both x and z going
to 2 digits. The existing parts\s\4186a.dat would become p\stuc1-48.dat. I'm
also assuming here that this would only be of value for regular stud.dat
primitives, so we dont need an extra character to capture the x in STUDx.DAT.
Chris

A 3x3, 3x4 and 4x4 trilogy :
* is only 3 files which satisfies the demanded compactness
* is 9 to 16 times faster than individual studs which satisfies the demanded
speed & size gain
* covers any rectangle >= 6x6 which satisfies the demanded usability in the
large
* is still usable in the small
* can simulate 8x8 (copy-paste four 4x4)

An additionnal 4x3 is required to maintain stud orientation (for stud logo).

May be the best would be 5 files: 3x3,3x4,4x3,4x4 and 8x8.

What do you think?

Damien



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
 
(...) In principle this sounds OK to me, but I would want to be somewhat restrictive about how many new files we have - 4x4, 6x6, 8x8 sound good combinations. What others? Regarding a naming convention, though, do we know how all renderers recognise (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)

27 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR