| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Tore Eriksson writes:
> > Regarding a naming convention, though, do we know how all renderers recognise
> > STUDx primitives to do the STU2x substitution for fast-draw mode? To avoid
> > any conflict here, and to add further value to the name, how about something
> > like STUCx-z meaning Stud Cluster x by z. I dont see any value in both x and
> > going to 2 digits.
>
> That's OK with me. As long as it won't conflict with the highly unofficial
> but to an unknown extent spread clone primities studc.dat, studc2.dat and
> studc2z.dat.
Hey, thanks for thinking of me! At present, I believe the only "official
unofficial" stud primitives for the clone.dat project are studc.dat and
stud2cl.dat. I'll have to double-check the studc2z.dat, though. In the
interest of diplomacy and efficiency, I am willing to change the name of the
clone stud primitives if they create a big problem for the canonical LCad
library.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
| (...) I thought of 4x4, too. First I rejected the idea as I thought it would only save 15 lines in a file but then I realized that it can be used more than once in a file. I can't find any other sombinations that I would like to have. Maybe, maybe a (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
