| |
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, David Laswell wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> From the way Steve explained it, it sounds like stug4 would be a 4x4 square, not
> a 2x2 square, in which case going from stugN to stugN+1 actually does give you
> another 2N+1 studs. When you think about it, by your reasoning, you'd never
...
Whoops; you're right.
--Travis
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: "Clusters" of Studs?
|
| (...) From the way Steve explained it, it sounds like stug4 would be a 4x4 square, not a 2x2 square, in which case going from stugN to stugN+1 actually does give you another 2N+1 studs. When you think about it, by your reasoning, you'd never (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
