Results 41 – 60 of about 4700.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Updated Primitives Reference
|
| (...) Sorry, but this is a bad idea. These primitives are unofficial - which means that before release the names might change. In fact some of them will definitely change. I don't like to break other peoples webpages, but this might happen now. (...) (16 years ago, 6-Apr-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|  
chris, dee
(score: 2.385)
|
|
| | Re: naming for some half-primitives
|
| (...) Please just use the next available axlehoXX and npegholX numbers; axleho10.dat (thats one-zero not ell-zero), npeghol8.dat and npeghol9.dat. I want to sort out a better naming convention for these, but I don't want to hold up creativity. Chris (...) (16 years ago, 26-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| |
|
chris, dee
(score: 2.379)
|
|
| | Re: Error in part #590
|
| (...) The parts update process is stalled for the present, whilst the LDraw Steering Committee resolve some remaining issues with the Contributor Agreement. In particular, how to deal with contributions from prolific authors who have not affirmed (...) (19 years ago, 23-Aug-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
part, chris, dee
(score: 2.373)
|
|
| | Re: Fixing the liftarms
|
| (...) We are aware of this and do have a plan to rectify it. Steve and I went through this a while ago, with a view to distinguishing between beams and lift-arms and consistently naming the beams. I recall our thinking was that "liftarm" would (...) (16 years ago, 24-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
chris, dee
(score: 2.350)
|
|
| | Slope Brick Round
|
| Following up on a comment by Chris Dee on part 33243 on the Tracker. . . There's this part 500 from the last parts update Slope Brick Round 1 x 6 Inverted The first mysterious thing about this name is that it starts with "slope", but then proceeds (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.db.brictionary)
| |
|
new, part, chris, dee
(score: 2.319)
|
|
| | Fixing the liftarms
|
| Hi all (and especially Chris Dee), I find the inconsistency in the naming of liftarms in LDraw to be quite frustrating and was wondering whether or not it would be worth setting a standard name class and sticking to it. Here's a sample list: Technic (...) (16 years ago, 20-Jan-09, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
chris, dee
(score: 2.312)
|
|
| |
|
new, part, chris, dee
(score: 2.259)
|
|
| | part 2347 [DAT]
|
| im sure someones been waiting for this just as long as I have. 0 Excavator Bucket 3 x 6 with Teeth 0 Name: 2347.ldr 0 ROTATION CENTER 0 0 0 1 "Custom" 0 ROTATION CONFIG 0 0 2 24 -59 13 -53 -60 13 -53 2 24 -60 13 -61 -60 13 -53 2 24 -60 13 -61 -56 13 (...) (19 years ago, 9-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
part, chris, dee
(score: 2.256)
|
|
| |
|
new, part, chris, dee
(score: 2.231)
|
|
| | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
| (...) Great - we are always looking for constructive help. (...) I don't see the benefit from this - the naming convention is well established and existing part authors know how to work with it. Is it that hard to learn? (...) Yes - as I have (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
| |
|
part, chris, dee
(score: 2.217)
|
|
| |
|
part, chris, dee
(score: 2.205)
|
|
| |
|
part, chris, dee
(score: 2.204)
|
|
| | Re: Part building advice - too many triangles/quads?
|
| (...) I think the filesize:quality ratio is good. I notice that almost everything is coded to 4 decimal places. Except when (and maybe not even then) a surface joins to a circular primitive, 3 DPs should be sufficient in parts (0.0001 LDu < 0.00002 (...) (20 years ago, 25-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
part, chris, dee
(score: 2.203)
|
|
| | Re: LEGOfactory and LDraw
|
| (...) <SNIP> (...) Thanks Jaco. I had been following the same line of research. Where LDraw has a 3-digit number and LDD now gives us a 4- or 5-digit version, I think we can treat that as "official" and rename in LDraw. Where there is a different 4- (...) (20 years ago, 16-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.mlcad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
part, chris, dee
(score: 2.195)
|
|
| | Re: Ok, seems to be the best place to ask...
|
| (...) OK - now you've made it clear that this request is linked to the hirstarts "project" I see the context of your question - which alters my response somewhat. You're free to develop non-Lego parts and primitives which can be rendered with the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
new, part, chris, dee
(score: 2.144)
|
|
| | Re: Container Box
|
| (...) Just checking my spare parts I find the following : This part definitely exists with solid studs, in Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow and I have examples of all these colours with 4345 moulded on. With hollow studs I have it in Black, Grey, (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
new, part, chris, dee
(score: 2.142)
|
|
| | Re: Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
|
| (...) I think there should only ever be one primary author - nowadays, the one that takes the responsibility of submitting to the Parts Tracker. During the CA header migration, where I have encountered this and assessed that it was a true (...) (17 years ago, 11-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
chris, dee
(score: 2.130)
|
|
| | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
| In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp wrote: (I've > read that there's a major update on classic windows in the pipeline.) (...) Yes, see (URL) This shows how I decided to organise these files a while back. The CA header conversion is nearing (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
chris, dee
(score: 2.128)
|
|
| |
|
part, chris, dee
(score: 2.124)
|
|
| | Re: Cockpits, and Facets, and Ninja, oh my!
|
| (...) I have posted a slightly improved version of 6058.dat to the Parts Tracker at (URL) does not solve all the problems with this part, but includes - correct height alignment of studs at z=70 and the adjoining fillets - realignment of bad quad on (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jul-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
part, chris, dee
(score: 2.123)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
