 | | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) My individual opinion (as opposed to the consensus opinion of the admins) is in general, I'd prefer the idealized pattern. Since mis-registrations cause many variations, it's 'better' to go for the middle ground. Since it's not always clear (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be? (loads of pics.)
|
|
(...) THINK they should've produced" and I correct any printing errors, like (...) misalignment, shades of color... In the past I had the same (...) the patterns I made and it cost me 2 month to get rid (...) Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) Hi Willy, In that case I would argue that the onus should be on the designer to choose whether or not to model the ideal or real pattern. If their part is a really weird one then it can be held but if all copies people can see are the same (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) Yeah, tell me about it! Me and a friend made a mock-up of the sign for the Datsville post office: (URL) low-res picture shows just a little of the flaw, but the letter 'S' is just so wrong. We decided to let it reach below the other three (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) hi mike, I design my patterns (URL) the way "I THINK they should've produced" and I correct any printing errors, like overlaps, misalignment, shades of color... In the past I had the same problem with many of the patterns I made and it cost me (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) I agree that it shouldn't be held for this reason. As for the original question, I think that they should be modeled in the way that it appears they were "intended" to be if and only if at least one of the various copies of the part that show (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) - snippage - (...) I'll agree 85% with Matt. As a casual LDraw user, I'd love to see new parts being available more quickly, which might be done with a more streamlined process. What I agree with Matt about is perhaps redefining the level of (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) You know, this piece typifies the problem with the process and why no new parts get published, at least from my view. The burden of detail required for approval is too onerous. In this particular part the ice cream is fine either way - as the (...) (19 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
I had the same argument with Steffen about part 3010pt6.dat (URL) I have a few of these bricks and all of them show the pattern slightly off-center. Also online pictures of this brick seem to be identical. Therefore I created the digital version of (...) (19 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
(...) Personally I prefer parts to look as they look not as they "should" look. Sometimes you can even use these imperfections to achieve good effects. Tim (19 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Should pattern be like we -think- they should be?
|
|
I got a hold vote some time ago to the part: (URL) do not agree with Steffen. I think we should try to be realistic. What is your opinion? And what is the opinion of the admins? cu MikeHeide (19 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | dat file for wedge piece 50955 and 50956
|
|
Hello dear fellows! For the instructions of a new model I would need .dat files for the newer wedge pieces: (URL) 50955 ((URL)) and (URL) 50956 ((URL)) Unfortunately it has not been made yet. However there exist the wedge pieces for: (URL) 42060 (...) (19 years ago, 10-Dec-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.mlcad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tyre 30.4x14
|
|
ludo soete schrieb: (...) On Peeron this part has the number: 30391. But it is not on the parts tracker. mikeheide (19 years ago, 26-Nov-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Tyre 30.4x14 VR
|
|
Hi all, Anyone having a mocup from the following tyre? (...) Any help with a mocup is apreciated. Regards, Ludo (19 years ago, 25-Nov-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Tyre 30.4x14
|
|
Hi all, Anyone having a mocup from the following tyre? (URL) I noticed the request for it abouth 4 years ago, and it is still not apearing on the LDRAW site - unofficial parts. Any help with a mocup is apreciated. Regards, Ludo (19 years ago, 25-Nov-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT file for 4531-9V Switches
|
|
(...) on LDraw's parts tracker searching for 4531. Thanks in advance for any (...) tracking it down. Hi, Take here a look for a mocup of the 9V RC points (100% plastic) by Thomas Burger: (URL) They are build after my mocup for the 9V point (with (...) (19 years ago, 25-Nov-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | parts for german old toy "plasticant"
|
|
When I was a child I played with Lego Bricks and also with the building toy plasticant. Last days my son found the last pieces that I have and my idea was to bring that into LDraw parts. You can found the parts that I already made on my webside (...) (19 years ago, 23-Nov-06, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | BFC extension ratified by the LSC
|
|
The LDraw Standards Committee (LSC) has ratified the Back Face Culling (BFC) language extension. The de-facto BFC standard was adopted by the LSC as their working draft (see (URL) and we have since been working to clarify and/or remove any (...) (19 years ago, 9-Nov-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: DAT file for 4531-9V Switches
|
|
Ed Andrews schrieb: (...) The number 4531 is the set number. Please have a look at peeron at (URL) to see the part numbers. I do not believe that they already made in LDraw. cu MikeHeide (19 years ago, 1-Nov-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | DAT file for 4531-9V Switches
|
|
Looking for a DAT file of the 9V Switches (Left + Right). Can't seem to find it on LDraw's parts tracker searching for 4531. Thanks in advance for any help tracking it down. (19 years ago, 31-Oct-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
