 | | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Maybe the following parts will help you, they are on the parts tracker: x587.dat 41681.dat 41679.dat cu Michael (21 years ago, 27-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Sir Bugge's lego page finally gone public! - Space, parts, sculpture and techniques!
|
|
After a long delay while fighting my father’s webhost to get them to support statistics on subdomains (since January), here it is with crappy statistics from nedstat instead. At last! It’s a page about all the models, I’ve made since the early (...) (21 years ago, 27-Oct-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.space, lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.build.sculpture, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.loc.dk, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Because there are 24 cogs. So a 48-segmented primitive is easier to modify than a 16-segmented one. (...) OK, I'll try that. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 27-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Why do high-res primitives make it easier to realize? Considering the size of this object, I'd lean toward needing to reduce it. Steve (21 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts [DAT]
|
|
And here is the primitive: CU Bernd 0 Click Rotation Socket Cogwheel Quarter 0 Name: 1-4crs.dat 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial Primitive 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 0 Inner Ring R = 11 LDU 0 Outer Ring R = 12 LDU 0 Upper Ring 2 24 0 0 11.2 0.5 0 11.35 2 (...) (21 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) Sorry but there is no finished part yet. (...) I could send you a nearly finished part (48169) where the bottom is open. But else it's finished. To Steve Bliss or Chris Dee: I've made the cylinder-thing with high-res- primitives because it was (...) (21 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Are there any further news on the knight parts? I wanted to start building them and found this discussion. So it would be interesting how far the proceeding is come up to now. Michael Heidemann (mikeheide) (21 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3036p01.dat - Plate 6 x 8 with Red Side
|
|
(...) There have to be more parts like this for the set 310. I tried to model it in MLCad, but this both parts are not enought. Also why is this part not on the parts tracker? I cant find it there Michael Heidemann (mikeheide) (21 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: magnet.dat
|
|
The first question: I don't have the older trainsets. Have LEGO magnets always been the same size? (I think they have) Unless they've changed in size, we should all be using the same size magnet in LDraw. You are correct, s\magnet.dat is both the (...) (21 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | magnet.dat
|
|
I think I can not use magnet.dat for the old Plate 2 x 4 with Magnet Holder (x499.dat) for the following reason: 1) I assume, that the newly created parts should be like reality. 2) Magnet.dat looks to me like a subpart that should not be like it (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | part # 47404 boat base [DAT]
|
|
i made this for rendering porposes. alot of missing quads and such under side. mockup till finished. 0 Boat Base Bow 12 x 10 0 Name: 47404.ldr 1 16 -90 4 -10 -1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 -1 stud3.dat 1 16 -100 4 0 -1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 -1 stud3.dat 2 24 -96 24 -26 (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 973psj.dat [DAT]
|
|
This version uses the revised subfiles for 973psb/psj. Also, I adjusted the size of the insignia (i.e., the two horizontal bars). I've already asked Thomas (offline) for his blessing to post this revision. I'm posting this here because the (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | 2440.dat [DAT]
|
|
Per Admin request..... Am sending to Admins via email, as well..... 0 Hinge 6 x 3 Radar/Blade/Spoiler/Panel 0 Name: 2440.dat 0 Author: John VanZwieten 0 Official LCad update 98-08 0 KEYWORDS Space, MTron, Blacktron, Blacktron 2, Blacktron II 0 (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) This is in my "delvolopment" queue for LDraw.org features. Unless Steve adds this to the PT, I think I can whip up a website module. -Orion (21 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) Yes, that's true. I do drop a mail to this list when I'd like to announce a part (in those rare cases when I have time to do some part authoring). The problem is that you get only feedback if the other part author working on the same part (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | RE: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) "Working on" (...) duplicate (...) I thought that was one of the purposes of lugnet.cad.dat.parts ?!?!?!? (21 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
(...) I join to Niel's opinion, it would be useful to have a so called "Working on" list to announce if an author is working on a certain part, to avoid duplicate efforts. The precursor of present day Part Tracker (I don't remember its proper name) (...) (21 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Working on 6032.dat Brick 2 x 3 x 1 & 2/3 Octagonal offset
|
|
I wasn't only talking about abandoned parts, but all the ones people are working on that'll take a long time to finish. (since the other ones probably gets finished before somebody else starts on them). But now you're forgiven (for the sins you’ve (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) It may be required by the part tracker, but it isn't required by the BFC spec. The spec specifically says that the first instance of any BFC command in a file implicitly turns on BFC certification in the file (unless of course it's a 0 BFC (...) (21 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BFC inversion...
|
|
(...) No it isn't. (...) You are correct. CERTIFY, according to the BFC spec, is only allowed once in the file, before the first 'executable' line, on the very first BFC meta-statement. In fact, CERTIFY is *required* on that line. Steve (21 years ago, 6-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
