Subject:
|
Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 20 Sep 2004 04:52:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4680 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Orion Pobursky wrote:
| |
Looks good. You chose a relativle simple part for your first, unlike me:
Guessing is fine as long as you’re not too far off.
-Orion
|
My goodness, that was one massive scary part! I’m going to look that up and see
how many lines it took!
I would have chosen the click rotation joint. I figured I needed a very simple
part to warm up.
Talking about “not too far off”, should I worry about rounding off a vertice to
the thousandths, hundredths, or tenths place?
P.S. - I just figured out, after several decades, what my math teacher labeled a
3D graph the way she did. While graphing the curve on the ZY plane, I aligned a
separate XY plane to the right of my main graph. I was running out of room with
my compass creating perpendicular bisectors. So, I super-imposed the steeper XY
slope onto the YY. My effort to save space bore an epiphany! I was so pleased
to finally “get it”! This type of “Ahha” experiences inspires me to create a
curriculum for kids.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
| (...) I try to stick to whole numbers whenever possible, or tenths if I must. That helps keep file sizes down. Keep in mind that 1 LDU is already 1/64th of an inch, making 0.001 LDU 1/64000 of an inch! No part file needs that level of detail. The (...) (21 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| | | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
| I personally round off the numbers to 4 decimals, but I’ve been known to do crazy stuff like modelling in 1/100 (max zoom in mlcad) and use 1-24 parts of high res primitives from time to time. But I would suggest you to round off to (at least) two (...) (21 years ago, 29-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Creating 47457.dat 2x2x2/3 Sloped&Rounded
|
| (...) submission (as soon as parts@ldraw.org lets me). (...) Looks good. You chose a relativle simple part for your first, unlike me: [LDrawPart 2618:7] (...) Don't worry about those. They're non-funtional and insignificant (...) Guessing is fine as (...) (21 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
