Subject:
|
Re: Need part number for a dangerous predator
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:10:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1389 times
|
| |
|
|
"Lee Gaiteri" <LummoxJR@aol.com> wrote in message news:G9I0FC.Jr5@lugnet.com...
>
> > In that case, you would be better off replacing ABEC with a quad ABDC and
> > a tri BED. This prevents unsightly rendering holes caused by rounding
> > error.
>
> Eh; considering the line in this case is completely vertical, rounding errors
> may be a bit less likely anyway.
But once your cat is rotated in a model, the line may no longer be vertical. The rounding errors occur at the rendering stage,
not the part creation stage.
This isn't a huge deal, IMO, but your parts will look better if you avoid connecting quads and tris other than at their vertices.
-John Van
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Need part number for a dangerous predator
|
| (...) Indeed. The task was way too daunting for me with all the triangles and quadrilaterals that were in place. (...) This is the sort of case that exists in my cat. On the bottom, back edge of the stud hole, there's a slight raised section in the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
