 | | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp wrote: (I've > read that there's a major update on classic windows in the pipeline.) (...) Yes, see (URL) This shows how I decided to organise these files a while back. The CA header conversion is nearing (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
|
(...) "A part I can buy" is not how we determine where to place a file. Since x322 represents a solid piece that a modeler may need to interact with directly (that is, give it a color). Looking at the files involved, the file locations and (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) For to solve the hold vote on this part, I think, that the current x322.dat should go into the s/ folder because this is not a PART that I can buy. So the file with the metal portion should be instead x322.dat and with the light (...) (17 years ago, 7-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | L(EGO)Draw part discrepancies
|
|
I have checked LEGO Universe Team parts ((URL) official or non-official parts when they exist, and noticed several differences. Could anyone who own some of these parts (I don't) check these differences and comment? (LUT version may not match real (...) (17 years ago, 6-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
(...) hmm ... looks like we got the "ideal" version as it has been projected by the part designers but the part was modified during the production. fact is we stick to the actual part as it comes out of the box and we will have to get rid off the (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
(...) it's a fine prog, anders! nonetheless I really wish it were a part of LDDP and not just a plug in - it doesn't allow polling to a viewer while I edit figures and to me visual feedback is crucial. BTW could you please check why Syncedit wipes (...) (17 years ago, 5-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
(...) Hey! I have a user :-) Cool! Now I *must* update the web site... (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
Thanks, Willy, for this very informative article... I discovered many things (among them, Syncedit that looks VERY interesting - how did I miss its announcement???). (...) Here you had a favorable situation with mostly flat surfaces. Similarly I (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Preparing a L(EGO)Draw part for the Parts Tracker – A review
|
|
When the Lego Universe Team has started to share rough data of 80 parts (URL) and soon after I've got feedback from part authors that because of their excellent quality those parts were heavyweights and would give us a hard time reducing the file (...) (17 years ago, 4-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !
|
| |
| | Re: Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
|
|
I think a part should only have one AUTHOR line (although, as you say, this is not stated in the library header spec) If a part has two or more authors, it falls into one of two possibilities a) Original author and one or more part modifier/updaters (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Are multiple AUTHOR tags legit?
|
|
I've noticed that a number of official parts have multiple 0 AUTHOR meta statements in the part header. All the ones I've seen so far have James Jessiman as the first author, and someone else as the second one. Is this the correct way to indicate (...) (17 years ago, 1-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone working on monorail tracks?
|
|
(...) Hi Mike, I begun the parts some months ago but hadn't enough time to go further with them. I will send you the parts by mail. CU Bernd (17 years ago, 22-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone working on monorail tracks?
|
|
(...) Is there any DAT file that reflects the efforts doing these two pieces. Also a mockup will help me. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 17-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | DATHeader Update
|
|
I have uploaded a new version (1.1.4) to my homepage (www.michael-heidemann.de). With this version also the lastest changes to the Official Parts Header Specification are maintained. cu mikeheide (17 years ago, 13-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with part 30208.dat
|
|
Please upload this version to the PT. Only by this it can be corrected completly. It is now so many years an official part and nowbody has realized that it was wrong. Your version works fine as I can see. There are also missing inner lines. So (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with part 30208.dat [DAT]
|
|
(...) Not necessary here, I just scaled the dome a bit to reduce size by 4 ldu. DAT file joined, tell me if it's ok now... Philo 0 Cylinder 4 x 4 Hemisphere Multifaceted 0 Name: 30208.DAT 0 Author: John VanZwieten 0 Official LCad update 99-02 0 // (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with part 30208.dat
|
|
(...) Yep, I think you are right. The 30208.dat part appears to be 4 LDU too tall, unless there are more than one brick version of this part. Unfortunate, because to correct it will probably take a complete reworking of the part. -Matt :) ---...--- (...) (17 years ago, 11-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Problem with part 30208.dat
|
|
I recently CAD'd my Tequila Sunrise locomotive, which uses the part 30208.dat, Cylinder 4 x 4 Hemisphere Multifaceted. As you can see in the render, the part is overlapping the arch piece on the boiler: (URL) I built this locomotive in real life (...) (17 years ago, 10-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) I see that the (URL) stl2dat page> has had its instructions updated. As I re-read them, I see that the -o5 option turns off generation of optional lines for concave faces (as of 1.13), and that they are on by default. Do you know if the (...) (17 years ago, 10-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L(EGO)Draw parts
|
|
(...) to ease access to the data we uploaded and linked the rough parts to the site: (URL) - don't forget to email us if you plan to fix a part in order to avoid overlapping work. w. LDraw Administration Team (17 years ago, 10-Sep-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
