Subject:
|
Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 8 Oct 2007 03:42:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5166 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Michael Heidemann wrote:
> For to solve the hold vote on this part, I think, that the current x322.dat
> should go into the s/ folder because this is not a PART that I can buy. So the
> file with the metal portion should be instead x322.dat and with the light bulb
> then it will be x322c01.dat.
"A part I can buy" is not how we determine where to place a file. Since x322
represents a solid piece that a modeler may need to interact with directly (that
is, give it a color).
Looking at the files involved, the file locations and filenames/part numbers are
fine as they are. If the part titles/names can be improved, then let's improve
them.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
| (...) SNIP (...) For to solve the hold vote on this part, I think, that the current x322.dat should go into the s/ folder because this is not a PART that I can buy. So the file with the metal portion should be instead x322.dat and with the light (...) (17 years ago, 7-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
