Subject:
|
Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Sun, 7 Oct 2007 21:02:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5215 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Steve Bliss wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Niels Karsdorp wrote:
> > > How should all the various bits be named and where should they be stored?
> >
> > There isn't always a flat rule for every case. And we'e got plenty of 'legacy'
> > files that don't conform to current rules.
SNIP
> > > * Metal bits (like connectors and such)
> > > - Name: YYYYs##.dat
> > > - Folder: Parts/S
> >
> > Yes. Especially for electrical bits.
> >
> > > * Complete assembly door/window + glass
> > > - Name: YYYYc##.dat or YYYY.dat?
> >
> > This isn't open to question - YYYYc##
> >
> > > - Folder: Parts
> > >
> > > * Complete assembly ABS/CA + metal bits
> > > - Name: YYYY.dat or YYYYc##.dat?
> >
> > Hmm. Depends on whether there are 1 or multiple plastic parts.
>
> Okay, splitting this into two possibilities:
>
> * Complete assembly of single ABS/CA + various metal bits
> - Name: YYYY.dat?
> - Folder: Parts
>
> * Complete assembly of multiple ABS/CA + various metal bits
> - Name: YYYYc##.dat
> - Folder: Parts
>
> > > * Shortcuts (door/window + removable glass, lightbrick with removable bulb,
> > > etc.)
> > > - Name: YYYYc##.dat
> > > - Folder: Parts
> > >
> > > Anything I've missed?
> >
> > Oh, probably. ;)
>
> Niels
For to solve the hold vote on this part, I think, that the current x322.dat
should go into the s/ folder because this is not a PART that I can buy. So the
file with the metal portion should be instead x322.dat and with the light bulb
then it will be x322c01.dat.
cu
mikeheide
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
| (...) "A part I can buy" is not how we determine where to place a file. Since x322 represents a solid piece that a modeler may need to interact with directly (that is, give it a color). Looking at the files involved, the file locations and (...) (17 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Parts vs subparts for compound parts
|
| (...) That's why I want to know for sure what to do for new authored parts. (I can't always look how existing parts were done, as these may not be conform to current rules, like you said.) (...) Many windows have just a simple rectangular glass (...) (20 years ago, 31-Aug-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
