 | | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) HURRAY!!! I made it through gonta's board and got in touch with him. stay tuned. w. www.holly-wood.it (20 years ago, 16-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
|
|
(...) How about not. s\3626bs00.dat exists for a specific purpose, and I don't think this is a good reason to hijack the file. Steve (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
|
|
(...) I would definitely like to do this, because the resulting heads look much better, IMO. (see (URL) Through the magic of perl, I've already modified many of the heads on my computer. (...) Hopefully it's the ball joint that's sized wrong, (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin
|
|
(...) I count about 49 heads. That's based on an out-of-date directory on my hard drive, there may be a few more by now. That's a lot of parts to update all in one go. We've done it before, or at least nearly; we redesigned the neck-mark on minifig (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker part Discussion: 3626bp01.dat, Head with std grin [DAT]
|
|
While I was reviewing this part; "Minifig Head with Standard Grin Pattern" (URL) came across this note; "The (sub)part is still missing most of the horizontal conditional edges. Could torus primitives be used?" My answer would be, "sure why not..." (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: CMDLINE (Issues on Parts Tracker)
|
|
(...) I have always liked CMDLINE followed by a default colour, and I have the feeling that I am one of those who have used it most times. I also think it really is a pity that it hasn't been used by any [online] catalog or other partlisters (that I (...) (20 years ago, 15-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: CMDLINE (Issues on Parts Tracker)
|
|
I like using the CMDLINE as a concise way of documenting the default (i.e., the *usual*, not necessarily the *only*) color of a part. The CMDLINE is usually shorter than the corresponding sentence. For example, for the Minifig Flame, I'd rather see (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
|
|
(...) Yes of course, because all Lego plastic-parts are expected to be virtual available. But these parts are complex and not everybody has them in his/her collection. So part-authors for such parts are welcome. Znap and other not so much liked (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
|
|
(...) Yes, if they are genuine Lego parts then of course they would be accepted. The limiting factor would be reviewers with enough familiarity with the parts to certify them. Chris (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
|
|
(...) I think it would depend mostly on how well they're designed. The images you cited look more like gamer graphics (rough 3D geometrics covered with "skins" to fill in all of the more specific details), but LDraw is more about fully-functional (...) (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
|
|
(...) Well I can't really answer that but I can't think of any reason why they wouldn't be. I would love for someone to create ldraw files for some of the parts in the Bohrok line so I can finally make instructions for my (URL) destroyer droid>. J (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
|
|
(...) The CMDLINE meta-statement was originally created to give us some way of giving rendering suggestions to programs that use the parts library. For instance, it was thought that we could specify a 180deg rotation for all those panel parts (like (...) (20 years ago, 13-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Snatch it?
|
|
(...) Did you try posting on Gonta's board/forum? Steve (20 years ago, 13-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Where can I get these cool 3d Bionicle Parts ?
|
|
I've gotten a couple of replies from people who might work on some Bionicle parts if they didn't think they'd be wasting their time or duplicating efforts. Here's a question : Would bionicle parts be allowed on the ldraw.org parts tracker ? (20 years ago, 14-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part: Train Wheel Old with 4 Studs and Traction Teeth
|
|
Oops, I noticed one miscalculation. The front of this wheel is not at -10.5 but at -12. Niels (20 years ago, 13-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part: Train Wheel Old with 4 Studs and Traction Teeth [DAT]
|
|
I have created another old part. It requires one new primitive: 4-4con41 (included below) 0 Train Wheel Old with 4 Studs and Traction Teeth 0 Name: Untitled 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 1 16 0 0 10 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 4-4edge.dat 1 16 0 0 (...) (20 years ago, 13-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
|
|
(...) Just a note: in this situation (which apparently is not actually the situation), this file should have used a tilde (~), not an underscore. Underscores are for "official part shortcuts", which are relatively rare creatures. Steve (20 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
|
|
(...) I've never used "CMDLINE -c" except under protest, and dislike its inherent obsolesence. One could argue that almost EVERY part occurs in only one colour the first time it is produced. As soon as the second colour is produced the dat file is (...) (20 years ago, 12-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
|
|
(...) This is always a good argument against removing any syntax. But see below. (...) As is this one. But see below. (...) Not a large number in the scheme of things really. IF the change is done to parts as they are changed anyway... I guess what (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Issues with a Few Parts on the Tracker
|
|
(...) I would say that it's a good thing to leave them in. 2 reasons for this: - Once developers decide they want to support it, the implementation is aleady there. - To remove them would force all the parts that have the command to go thruogh PT (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
