 | | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) I'm not certain if I agree with you here... ;-) The part I measured (and digitized) is one that came with my 6981 Aerial Intruder and has the dimensions that I used. (...) Yes, in the past I decided to do the decorated elements as (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: POV in Part
|
|
(...) How about me, myself and I...? ;-) I've been thinking about a conversion ability between LDraw and my libraries for quite a while now, even talked to a few people about that, leaving me a few options...: 1> Get in contact with Lars and have (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: POV in Part
|
|
(...) My library is currently being rebuild and all buttons on the bricks are getting a selectable rounded edge, they take up a whole extra amount of rendering time so I've made them an option. Also, I've always looked at new Lego(TM) and there are (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Has anyone made the Johnny Thunder hat...
|
|
(...) (URL) so, this is as far as I made it. The folded brim and the buckled top have me at a loss on how to finish it. If someone wants to give it a shot let me know. (URL) (21 years ago, 20-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Has anyone made the Johnny Thunder hat...
|
|
...even as a mock-up? Curious, and hoping someone has, --Ryan (URL) (21 years ago, 19-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) [snip comparision of libraries] Many parts look about the same, whether their code came from LDraw or Anton's library. Also, there are a number of small differences between the versions of the some parts in the two libraries. Sometimes Anton's (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) Hmm, thinking more about this, it could be done with individual files, and then a single master file that includes all the individual wrapper files. The master file could be auto-generated whenever the wrapper-library is updated. That would be (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
"Michael Horvath" <mhorvath2161@juno.com> wrote in message news:HI33p4.1w9H@lugnet.com... (...) Isn't very flexible, is it? (...) couple of (...) Before you go and render, think of this: LDraw: rectangles and triangles that make up lego parts, (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) That's it. Do you think you could add to that? I guess a POV file could be made that would automatically generate a gallery. I'll have to look into that. -Mike (21 years ago, 17-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) I think the 1:1 aproach would be better. Using one main include file might be convienient, but makes it difficult for many authors to contribute to. (...) Something like this? (URL) do not use the part files from there, most of them have been (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) I'm torn - using a single file in POV-Ray is definitely more convenient, and 750 definitions don't seem to be too much overhead for the parsing engine to chew on. But for (later) updates to the wrapper library, individual files would work (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Can somebody send me a picture of ...
|
|
Hi all, I'm currently working on (URL) 30639 Container 4x4x4>. I'm nearly done with it, just have to add the hinges. I have 30639, but there is a similar piece (URL) 30637 Container 4x2x4> which I don't have. If somebody could send me a few pictures (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
Just to drop in my 2 cents, I think putting them into one file would be better. Also, could you put up a quality comparison chart? Three shots of a couple of parts, each, so we can compare? Thanks, Mike (21 years ago, 15-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Custom Parts
|
|
I need some customized parts made to be used with my LeoCAD projects. They can be .dat files. I need two differnet hinge plates made short in two sizes. I have no clue how to go about doing it. If some one can do it for me it would be great. For me (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Question about the layering of dithered colors
|
|
(...) Yes, you can use standard colors (0-15, 32-47) in a subpart that has color 16 for a dithered color. (...) Yes. Each dithered color must go in a separate subfile, but each subfile may have any number of standard color items. One exception to (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) [snip stuff about ldraw-to-Anton] (...) Not yet -- this project's been back-burnered for a bit. I finished making the wrapper files, and got distracted. Steve (21 years ago, 12-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Question about the layering of dithered colors [DAT]
|
|
dear senior authors, I'm currently working on vector-versions of the two space-bricks 1x6x5 (tony hafner uploaded hires-scans on brickshelf and you can see them in his gallery on (URL) I plan to make usage of a multipart-file for the border and (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part - Castle Wall
|
|
(...) Hello, I already corrected that part according to Bernd's picture and remarks. Thanks again, Bernd. Please check the result here (URL) (21 years ago, 11-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Hi Steve, Have you contacted Anton about this? He's not a bad guy and is willing to help where needed. Jeroen (21 years ago, 11-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part - Castle Wall
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Bernd Broich wrote: < snip...> (...) I'd rather call it challenging :-)) But you are right. It shouldn't be our usuall way of working. It is sufficient for mock-ups and that was my first intention. Because result was pretty good I (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
