| | Re: Weird Error
|
|
(...) Maybe not the next release - this file has a few more issues to be addressed, and it probably won't be taken care of by then. Steve (22 years ago, 31-May-02, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: when to use "~" for title of subfile...
|
|
(...) The tilde is not needed for any subparts (subpart=file in parts\s\). The tilde is used to note part files that do not need to be displayed in general part listings. Steve (22 years ago, 31-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Weird Error
|
|
(...) My version (Official LCad update 98-02) also has the erroneous line, which should be fixed for the next release... I think the " 1 16" at the end of the line should be deleted. The 30033.dat also has several identical (duplicate) lines. L3P (...) (22 years ago, 31-May-02, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: new titles for subfiles (was "proper titles") [LONG]
|
|
(...) [insert] "...that I've written..." [/insert] :-P (...) Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | new titles for subfiles (was "proper titles") [LONG]
|
|
Steve, Here's the complete list of unofficial subfiles whose titles aren't already in the format that you wanted. I've listed each with a suggested new title. Thanks, Franklin These subfiles are needed only by their "parent" file, thus, the tildes (...) (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | when to use "~" for title of subfile...
|
|
(...) Steve, What subfiles, in your opinion, would need the tilde ("~") as the first character? I'm thinking that any subfile created for dithered color usage, and is used only for that one file, would qualify. But I could be wrong... Thanks, (...) (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: The Mummy (from "Adventurers" theme)
|
|
(...) "Another"? Chris, you haven't been paying attention to Franklin's level of minifig activity. At this point, he's qualifying for the "Mr. Prolific" award. Steve (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: The Mummy (from "Adventurers" theme)
|
|
(...) That sounds the best way to go. Great to see another minifig author. Chris (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: updating "Leg" files (was "The Mummy")
|
|
(...) Right. (...) No, not really. Clean the titles up to: s\971s01.dat Minifig Leg Left without Front Surfaces s\972s01.dat Minifig Leg Right without Front Surfaces Thanks! Steve (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: proper titles for subfiles (was "Rebel A-Wing Pilot Torso")
|
|
(...) I'd be happy to compile a list of the subfiles I've written (as time permits) with suggested new titles for same, if you'd be willing to admin-update the files (so that whatever votes they've got won't go away). Would that be OK? Thanks, (...) (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: updating "Leg" files (was "The Mummy")
|
|
(...) OK, will do. According to my count, these are the six official files to be modified: 972.DAT Minifig Leg Left 972P63.DAT Minifig Leg Left with Robot Pattern 971.DAT Minifig Leg Right 971P63.DAT Minifig Leg Right with Robot Pattern s\971s01.dat (...) (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Wheel holder pin
|
|
(...) Well, I've got a carbase 4 X 12 X 1+2/3 that I believe hasn't been modeled yet. I would also be willing to redo the parts that would use this primitive. (22 years ago, 30-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Re: Wheel holder pin
|
|
(...) they all use the same structure? Are you making a part that is going to use this primitive? Steve (22 years ago, 29-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
|
| | Re: The Mummy (from "Adventurers" theme)
|
|
(...) You should move the remaining 'outside front' surfaces from the leg subfiles to the blank main files, and update the existing printed-leg parts to match the changes. That requires updating 6 official files, and your 3 unofficial files. (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: part 30592 (NAME??)
|
|
(...) Heh. You're right, this is a complex one. Previously, we've tended to not (always) note cut-outs or details -- look at the various curved brick or arch parts with 'plate-tabs' at the top. So, for this file, I'd go with 'Brick 2 x 4 x 2/3 with (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: New Part: 973P73 - Minifig Torso with Vest with Patch Pockets pattern
|
|
(...) Not clearly; I think the discussion was limited to parts which appeared in multiple neck-stripe colors, not *which* neck-stripes colors we were going to use. (...) Yes, that's the bit I remember clearly. .... I did some digging, and came up (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: subfile for new part (Rebel *A-wing* pilot torso)
|
|
(...) Oh, probably. Except it needs to be rewritten to describe what to do, instead of what not to do. :) (...) True, but I think we covered the filenames well enough that the exception is adequately handled. (...) What are your feelings about (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Baseplates with pattern
|
|
(...) Well, that's a bit of good news. I think. :) At least, it removes one issue from the table. Steve (22 years ago, 29-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: New Part: 973P73 - Minifig Torso with Vest with Patch Pockets pattern
|
|
(...) I'm still catching up on everything after getting back from Colorado; I wanted to quickly supply the answer to your question. For CMDLINE, look on page (URL), question "What is the CMDLINE meta-statement?". For KEYWORDS (and CATEGORY), look on (...) (22 years ago, 29-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
|
| | Re: The Mummy (from "Adventurers" theme)
|
|
(...) (URL) Then, I'll encode the Legs. Which leads me to a quandry... (...) I'm still hoping for feedback on this... Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 29-May-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|