Subject:
|
Re: I am Happy!!! (was Re: Transparent parts (small))
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:12:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1139 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.cad, Jaco van der Molen wrote:
> Compare:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/sjaacko/Temp/LPubTests/bbsswinr_0_05_ci.png
> with
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/sjaacko/Temp/LPubTests/bbsswinr_0_05_ci_better.png
>
> I will take the "longer" rendering time for granted! It is worth
> waiting a little while longer ;-)
Hmmm, I don't know. While I think you've probably made the right
choice selecting ldview (it's the better renderer), I don't think
you're comparing the right stuff in those two pics. The "better"
ldview pic doesn't display the halo problem because you've got
antialiasing turned off. And those nasty jagged lines are gonna
eat away at your brain until you're no longer happy ;^)
Unfortunately it sounds like you'll get the same halo effect in ldview
if you turn on antialiased lines. And that won't make you happy
either.
The workaround for ldglite is to get lpub to pass a background
color that matches, or disable antialiasing. Either way your
transparent parts will look better, and your halo will be dimmer.
I suspect the same would work for ldview.
Have Fun,
Don
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: I am Happy!!! (was Re: Transparent parts (small))
|
| (...) Believe me: this is the way I want it. (...) Antialiasing does indeed cause the halo effect. And no, it won't. What will however is create images at a higher resolution and scale those down in Fireworks or similar program. This will antialias (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jun-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread: ![Transparent parts (small) -Jaco van der Molen (8-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Transparent parts (small) -Travis Cobbs (8-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Transparent parts (small) -Travis Cobbs (8-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Transparent parts (small) -Jaco van der Molen (9-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Transparent parts (small) -Travis Cobbs (9-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Transparent parts (small) -Jaco van der Molen (9-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![I am Happy!!! (was Re: Transparent parts (small)) -Jaco van der Molen (9-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: I am Happy!!! (was Re: Transparent parts (small)) -Jaco van der Molen (10-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: I am Happy!!! (was Re: Transparent parts (small)) -Travis Cobbs (10-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: I am Happy!!! (was Re: Transparent parts (small)) -Kevin L. Clague (10-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: I am Happy!!! (was Re: Transparent parts (small)) -Anders Isaksson (10-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: I am Happy!!! (was Re: Transparent parts (small)) -Travis Cobbs (10-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Transparent parts (small) -Don Heyse (8-Jun-05 to lugnet.cad)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|