 | | Re: Questions about LPub —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | (...) Jacko, This is because hinge.ldr references itself in a LPUB PLI BEGIN SUB hinge.ldr. I removed the offending LPUB PLI BEGIN SUB/LPUB PLI END. I copied the parts listed in hinge.ldr to the places you used hinge.ldr. I then surrounded those (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | Hello Kevin, (...) I have a similar problem: pack_callout: accumulated width too large but AFAIK it is not a recursive call problem... The mpd file is here (the problem occurs when generating layout 5) (URL) purpose of the callout (and tentative (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) I got this one fixed: it was caused by the "0 ROTSTEP END" at the end of the subfile (actually a plain 0 STEP at the end also brings on this behaviour) Philo (20 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) There are a couple of things that throw LPub off and I'm trying to figure out how to make it "do the right thing". You have: ROTSTEP part part part STEP ROTSTEP END This is equivalent to: part part part ROTSTEP ROTSTEP END LPub ignores STEP (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) Good luck, I guess that the overall code is quite involved! The last problem remaining for me (the results I have so far are very good!) is the step number placement: (...) Any idea? Something on the documentation too: - I found no information (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | | (...) I'll wrestle with it. (...) I have to kill that example. (...) Reasonable. (...) L3P is required for LDView and ldglite to help me understand the camera distance needed. (...) Kevin (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) I have this fixed and it is available in LPub 2.3.0.9. (...) Great! (...) I just updated the documentation with this: LPUB STEP_NUMBER PLACEMENT edge justification relative_to - The step number can be relative to the step image using a (...) (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | | Hi Kevin, (...) Great! (...) Kevin, I think there is something broken in your installer build process about the help file: 2.3.0.9 lpub.html is identical to the one I got with 2.3.0.8. (...) Not in the file I got here: the following item is LPUB (...) (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) This was not a documentation problem... in fact all my pages were multi-step, and LPUB STEP_NUMBER PLACEMENT doesn't seem to work in that case. I reverted a page to single step, and it works fine. Philo (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Kevin L. Clague
|
| | | | (...) Philo, In my code and the documentation I posted yesterday, STEP_NUMBER can only be placed relative to PLI or PAGE. It currently cannot be placed relative to the ASSEM image. Therefore you cannot do what you want. In LPub traditional form (...) (19 years ago, 29-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Questions about LPub —Philippe Hurbain
|
| | | | (...) OK... Note that unfortunately I still don't have that updated documentation (installer problem, see (URL) In LPub traditional form (which is annoying), the "mistake" of using ASSEM, is (...) Yes, that deafening silence is annoying. After (...) (19 years ago, 30-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| | | | |
