| | Re: Part number for crystal in Rock Raider sets?
|
|
(...) *chromed* element. We don't have a number for the non-chromed version (like the various trans-crystals which appear in Rock Raiders. Steve (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
(...) I meant exactly CASE-SENSITIVE. and by case-sensitive I mean "model.dat" is different from "Model.dat". And why can't we choose between ? It's a lot easyer to convert from a case-sensitive complient filename to case-INsensitive than the other (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
Rui: (...) ^^^...^^^ I presume you mean "mixed case". We can't choose between case-sensitive and case-insensitive. (...) I am not sure of that. There are many good reasons for working with case-insensitive file systems. (...) I don't get your point (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote... (...) Yes, I began modelling the 358 Rocket Base in LEdit two years ago, and almost finished, when I realized the top of the rocket was not in LDraw yet. Should of course have checked before I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
(...) What I meant was this: normally ledit shoes studs as lines, right. Several files were changed to uppercase so that ledit would not do the substitution and show the studs. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
(...) So this is not a problem, just change the primitive file "stud.dat" to "stud.DAT" (according to what I have previously proposed), and if the user wants (or not) to draw the studs, he will change the "line for stud" option of Ledit. P.S. Just (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
(...) This is a special LEdit feature, not related to DOS at all. If the STUD.DAT filename is uppercase, it is always displayed like a full stud in LEdit, even if the user chooses to have "line for stud" to save rendering time. Fredrik (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
(...) Are you sure that was the problem, because Ledit runs on DOS, which doesn't care on filename case, it's case-insensitive, so it should always work in DOS. Rui Martins (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
(...) There is one problem. several files were "corrected" to have the stud.dat references uppercased so that ledit would show the studs. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 20-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Ldlite for OpenGL and Linux (and uppercase filenames)
|
|
(...) Why don't we just define filenames are case-sensitive, and allow for an option to treat them differently (case-insensitive) if someone requires it ? we should look in to the future, every OS will tend to be case-sensitive, windows hasn't made (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | Re: Using parts in p\48\ (was: part 2951, more questions, nearly done)
|
|
(...) Sure, no problem. I prefer to inline and find the true coordinates of the polygons in the primitives, though. There may be some small rounding errors both in your sine calculations and in LEdit's, and if they don't match, you'll get small (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
|
| | RE: OMR Filenaming Standard Change?
|
|
Hi, (...) I agreee. (...) Maybe I don't remember correctly, but until now I assumed that the term 'alternate model' refers to those models in the instruction booklet that can be built from the same set of parts. Just to clear my understanding, (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
|
| | Re: Introducing and Planning .datFest
|
|
sorry bout the duplicates there.... ugh. (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.datfest)
|
|
| | Re: Introducing and Planning .datFest
|
|
(...) Maybe we could collaborate on this.... I've got a couple ideas for parts of the logo, but I know if a few of us work together it could be a lot better. LMKWYT Jameson Robert Gagnepain JamesonRobert.com Web Services (URL) #17714608 (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.datfest)
|
|
| | Re: Introducing and Planning .datFest
|
|
(...) Maybe we could collaborate on this.... I've got a couple ideas for parts of the logo, but I know if a few of us work together it could be a lot better. (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.datfest)
|
|
| | Re: Introducing and Planning .datFest
|
|
(...) Exactly what I was thiking about doing. Again, this is after we have received permission from each author to republish their work on CD and include it in a package for registration in exchange for funds etc etc.. -Tim (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.datfest)
|
|
| | Re: Introducing and Planning .datFest
|
|
(...) how bout the whole software collection? (IE ldao,simlego,ldd,ldl...,mlcad...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.datfest)
|
|
| | Re: Introducing and Planning .datFest
|
|
(...) Yeah, that's the main one I'm shooting for. Though it would be excellent to help out other LDraw experts on a per-needed basis with travel expenses. (...) Heck yeah... Hopefully by then the OMR will be running and substantial, so we could put (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.datfest)
|
|
| | Re: Introducing and Planning .datFest
|
|
(...) That'd be great! :) Although I'm probably one of the closest... It would be really great to pay the Jessimans' trip... (...) LDraw doesn't take up much room--you could put tons of extra stuff on a CD... (...) I could give it a shot... (...) (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.datfest)
|
|
| | Re: Cauldron Born Battle Mech - (Ultra Modified)
|
|
Jason Bennett wrote in message ... (...) Its pretty cool! Most posts here should contain a DAT file or direct discussion of one... (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|