Subject:
|
Re: Reference Site Inconsistencies
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:13:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1092 times
|
| |
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote...
> First, Lutz lists a part, lg_0966 Cone 4 x 4 x 3, but has no picture for it.
> Did LEGO ever produce a part which matches this description?
Yes, I began modelling the 358 Rocket Base in LEdit two years ago, and almost
finished, when I realized the top of the rocket was not in LDraw yet.
Should of course have checked before I started...
> Some of the parts on James' pages were not released in LDraw. I assume he drew
> these parts in enough detail to create the images on his reference pages, but
> they were not complete enough to release. An example of this is part 41. This
> part looks like the same level crossing as Arne Hackstein authored as part 813.
>
> Can anyone confirm that part 41 is the same as 813?
Judging from the images on James's site and a fresh LDraw of Arne Hackstein's parts,
they are the same - and the same as the level crossing I hold in my hand! It must be
25 years old, and hasn't any numbers on it.
41 = 813 Train Level Crossing Base
42 = 812 Train Level Crossing Center Rail Cap Insert
> 1) Would it be allowed to have part 0?
I think Terry once mentioned that he had an (empty) 0.dat he used for positioning
and setting of the rotation point...
/Lars
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Reference Site Inconsistencies
|
| I was cross-checking some information between LDraw/Partsref, Lutz Uhlmann's Parts Reference, and James Jessiman's Unofficial LEGO Parts Listing. I was specifically looking at the parts with number less than 1000[1], because I need to get a better (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
