 | | Re: Problems with Online Hobby Train Instructions
|
|
(...) Please check out Paul S. D'Urbano's response to my same question: (URL) Paul's method worked for me. Joseph (18 years ago, 24-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 postponed?
|
|
(...) [...] (...) ctrl+4 on Windows. command+4 on a Mac [...] (...) (18 years ago, 24-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Problems with Online Hobby Train Instructions
|
|
Anyone have any pointers for successfully downloading the instructions for the new Hobby Train set (10183) (Windows XP) ? I've already downloaded LDD 2.0. When I click on the 'Download' icon at the instructions page, a new window briefly flashes (...) (18 years ago, 24-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 postponed?
|
|
(...) Well, it seems I may have spoken too soon. By going through and updating all of my drivers (I suspect the graphics card driver was the critical one) I've been able to get it to run on my Windows 2000 Pro machine. It freezes occasionally when (...) (18 years ago, 23-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 postponed?
|
|
(...) Actually, from my fooling around with the software so far, I can say that there is some compatability between LDD 1,6 and LDD 2,0. When you try to load a file created with version 1,6 with version 2,0 it asks you if you want to try to import (...) (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Conversion file for ldraw to ldd
|
|
Hi all, I've converted the old conversion file from LDD 1.6 (with Jason Railton's adaptions) to LDD 2.0 format. It is far from perfect but is also far better than what is currently available. To install it just quit LDD 2, go to (...) (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 postponed?
|
|
(...) :: snip :: (...) I share Jason's sentiment - I wish they would have kept compatibility with all but the most recent versions of Windows. I guess the software people decided that was the best thing to do. But it does pose an inconvenience for (...) (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 Plans
|
|
(...) Did you actually get this to work? It has been my experience that it doesn't work yet. Mike (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 postponed?
|
|
(...) On the plus side, it does seem to run on older hardware. I could only run 1.6 on my wife's laptop which she bought last year. Last night, I was able to install and run 2.0 on my 5+ year old machine. -Elroy (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 postponed?
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, LDD 2.0 no longer runs on earlier versions of Windows. LDD 1.6 ran quite happily under Windows 2000, but the new version crashes as soon as you place a brick. It's also a bit mean to write off all the previously uploaded models. (...) (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 Plans
|
|
(...) LDraw support is under the Import and Export options. Sadly, only flat LDR files are supported, not MPDs. (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 Plans
|
|
(...) Worked like a charm! Thank you. Now...can we save these 2.0 files into LDraw like we could with 1.6? First attempt with simply apending .ldr to the file name in a 'save as' yield run errors in MLCAD. Joseph (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 Plans
|
|
(...) Yeah, the Factory web site has been doing that to me for a while now. When I click on the light-blue download button IE blips at me and I get nothing. You can work around it by going to the instructions in the factory gallery itself. Click on (...) (18 years ago, 22-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | LDA Progress Report
|
|
This is wierd. For several months, nothing has been posted about LCad CGI animation in Lugnet, and suddely the resuluts from three very different projects are published in I think less than a week. And even more funny: Without knowing of the other (...) (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | 10183 Plans
|
|
It has been posted that the 10183 plans are supposed to be available on the 23rd...but they are currently shown on the LDD site with a download button. When I try to download one, something pops up on my screen, makes a sound and goes away. When my (...) (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Sneekpreview on animation software
|
|
(...) Screen space is a bit of a problem indeed, it runs out very fast :) That's why I support dual (or even more in theory) screens. But every screen can also have multiple desktops, and for each desktop you can choose from 'windowed' or 'tabbed' (...) (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Sneekpreview on animation software
|
|
(...) What about those of us that only have one screen? Can you show an example of how it would look there? It seems to me the UI with the large sliders is a bit space consuming. Maybe just a numerical display of the current value (the top part of (...) (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: What's new in LDD 2.0?
|
|
(...) So far I think that may be the only thing. I only see 8-10 % CPU. So much for wishing they would have improved LDD with all the recommendations they got. Back to Ldraw again for me. (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | Re: What's new in LDD 2.0?
|
|
(...) It is significantly faster and less of a hog. Apparently some people are running into graphic card problems but it's a huge, huge, huge improvement of 1.6. Featurewise 2.0 has a lot of cute things like right-click view rotation and other (...) (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
| |
| | What's new in LDD 2.0?
|
|
Anyone figured out what the differences are between LDD 1.6 and 2.0? Does it still hog every available CPU cycle? --Bram (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)
|
