 | | Re: Rendering implementation details
|
|
(...) no, he didn't. when I last met him at legoworld 03 he promised to do it but actually never did (as far as I remember at the time windz had an error quote of 2-3 percent - too much from his point of view :-(( w. actually I'll add the (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
|
(...) Basically the all this CA is telling you is that you need to agree to release your part under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence for us to accept your part for distribution. The Creative Common Organization is kind enough to provide a (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
|
(...) For example: "The right to create derivative works of the Work" Does that mean altering the works (in this case: editing my dat files and make updates on them) without trying to contact me first? Or does it just mean works that uses my works? (...) (20 years ago, 31-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Rendering implementation details
|
|
(...) It has been done before. Ildefonso Junior Zanette wrote a program called Windz, I use it all the time when I author parts. I can't remember if he publically released it. -Orion (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Rendering implementation details
|
|
(...) It doesn't matter, actually. In one way or another, optional lines are required. In general, the "magic halo" effect only highlights _outside_ edges, but for a non-convex object, that won't necessarily be adqeuate. You can't even get away with (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
|
(...) What exactly is hard to understand. We tried to write the CA as clearly as possible without being ambiguous. Chris or I (or any other SteerCo member) would be more than happy to explain whatever part is confusing to you to your satisfaction. (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations 2005 SteerCo -- Tore Eriksson
|
|
(...) Sorry, but I have to decline. Maybe next year. Thanks for the nomination though! /Tore (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Contributor's Agreement (Was: New Part...)
|
|
(...) Oh dear. Then write the agreement in a little easier English so we have a chance to know what we sign. What is that agreement good for anyway? Is it something the Jessiman's wanted? And the security demands for passwords are way higher than my (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3067pt3.dat - Brick 1 x 6 without Center Studs with black STORE Pattern
|
|
(...) Hold on there ! The reason that Tore does not currently have submit privileges is that we are waiting for his affirmation of the Contributor Agreement. (URL) of the date of this announcement, everyone's submission rights were revoked and only (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part: 3067pt3.dat - Brick 1 x 6 without Center Studs with black STORE Pattern [DAT]
|
|
(...) 1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\3067s01.dat (...) Hi Tore, I just uploaded your file to the parts tracker. I had to adjust the entry for the subfile (slash converted to backslash) Michael Heidemann (mikeheide) (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New Part: 3067pt3.dat - Brick 1 x 6 without Center Studs with black STORE Pattern [DAT]
|
|
Looks like I have lost my priviliges to submit parts to the Tracker... Could somebody please submit this before the part number is taken by somebody else. /Tore 0 Brick 1 x 6 without Center Studs with black STORE Pattern 0 Name: 3067pt3.dat 0 (...) (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Fixed LGEO parts
|
|
(...) My webhotel seems to have had a diskcrash and has restored an older backup. I have now checked all files and took the opportunity to add three new LGEO fixes. /Lars (20 years ago, 30-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Rendering implementation details
|
|
(...) Ok, I drew a better picture (2 planes in space and a floating eye) and I'm starting to see. Maybe you're onto something. It takes 2 surface normals and one point on the edgeline to divide space into 4 quadrants. Then you only need to figure (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: BMP2DAT question (problem?) [DAT]
|
|
(...) If I understand the problem correctly, you have to scale down the output file. This can be easily done by pretanding that it is a sub-part Rename it to pattern.dat for example. Then create a new part that calls to that pattern with the line: 1 (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | BMP2DAT question (problem?)
|
|
Hi, I made some stickers for one of my trains. Now i'm making building instructions for this train and would like to add the stickers i made in the LDRAW design. Therefore i use the BMP2DAT utility found in LDAdd-On from Steven Bliss. This works (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Fixed LGEO parts
|
|
(...) Hi Lars Are These Still Available? Link didn't work. Thanks Chris (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Rendering implementation details
|
|
(...) What you are describing is in fact a very old and basic edge rendering algorithm, which can be found in most detailed textbooks on computer graphics. CAD style and wire frame rendering went out of style during the 90's, so some recent "fancy (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | LPub vertical plate murk
|
|
I'm using LPub for a project and have been perplexed a bit by the image quality difference between rendering the "Complete Assembly" vs the "Instruction Images". It might be the same issue as in this thread: (URL) For vertical grey plates, the studs (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy, anyone?
|
|
Thanks for your suggestions, the message I received is: "Yes, a good and useful translator would be appreciated." One brief comment on the issue of whether we want clean, compact and well structured files or not: of *course* we want clean files! A (...) (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: l3p as open source
|
|
(...) L3P is available for the Mac and Linux.... Kevin (20 years ago, 29-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
